Paper · 2024 · Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Intercropping Legumes Improves Long Term Productivity and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Kathrin Fuchs; David Kraus; Tobias Houska; et al.

1
claims
1
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Food, feed, and fiber production needs to increase to support demands of the growing population in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA), while soil fertility continues to decline. Intercropping, the cultivation of two or more crop species on the same field, can provide yield benefits and is suggested to positively affect soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks. This study uses the biogeochemical model system LandscapeDNDC with the objective to (a) represent maize‐legume intercropping systems in different bioregions in SSA by simultaneously simulating both crops and their interactions and (b) assess long‐term (20 years) impacts of intercropping under varying mineral fertilizer inputs (0–150 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ) on productivity as well as soil organic C and N stocks. We test LandscapeDNDC on 82 field data sets (site‐year‐treatment combinations) from 18 sites to represent yields and soil C/N dynamics of maize‐legume intercropping systems. Using the model for long‐term scenario simulations showed that intercropping allows to sustain productivity and to improve or maintain SOC stock in low or zero fertilizer systems if all residues are returned to the soil. In contrast, for sole‐cropped maize systems, a decline in SOC stocks was simulated unless a minimum of 35 kg N ha −1 yr −1 of fertilizer was applied at full residue return. We conclude that intercropping using legumes alongside sufficient residue return allows for stabilizing long‐term yields while avoiding SOC losses even with low fertilizer N inputs. Overall, our study confirms the potential of intercropping as a sustainable agricultural practice that could significantly contribute to food security in SSA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-cropped maize lost SOC stocks unless at least 35 kg N ha −1 yr −1 fertilizer was applied with full residue return.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole‐cropped maize systemse0
Outcome
SOC stockse0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
unless a minimum of 35 kg N ha −1 yr −1 of fertilizer was applied at full residue returne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, for sole‐cropped maize systems, a decline in SOC stocks was simulated unless a minimum of 35 kg N ha −1 yr −1 of fertilizer was applied at full residue return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1346 · show in text ↑

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.