Paper · 2024 · Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences/Alexandria Journal of Soil and Water Sciences

Improving Dry Onion Yield, Bulbs Nutrients Status, Water Productivity and Calcareous Soil Properties under Water Stress Using Bio-Stimulants

Mostafa Mohamed Zahran

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

There is little information on how improve onion dry yield and status of nutrients in plants and soil under water scarcity. To fill this gap, two field experiments were conducted during two consecutive winter seasons. Three treatments of irrigation levels were designed in the main plot (100% of crop evapotranspiration, 80% ETc and 60% ETc). Four bio-stimulants soil treatments were designed in the sub-plot: control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH. Generally, bio-stimulants increased onion productivity significantly and decreased the negative impact of water shortage. During both seasons, YE followed by YE+KH recorded the highest bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yield, dry matter content, NPK content, NPK uptakes, protein yield and soil water holding capacity. While KH followed by YE+KH or YE recorded the highest available soil NPK, EC and soluble ions values. The pH lowest values were recorded in soil treated with KH or KH+YE. Comparing the 80% ETc with YE treatment and the 100% ETc with YE treatment, it was found that the amount of reduction in dry onion yield amounted to only 3.18% as an average for the two seasons with saving 20% of irrigation water. However, onion dry production was greater with YE at 80% ETc than with untreated plants under 100% ETc irrigation level by 24.36% as average of two seasons. In conclusion, YE and or YE plus KH may be major factors in enhancing soil fertility and plant stress tolerance by insufficient irrigation water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants significantly increased onion productivity.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bio-stimulantse0
Outcome
onion productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio-stimulants increased onion productivity significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants decreased the negative impact of water shortage on onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bio-stimulantse0
Outcome
negative impact of water shortagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio-stimulants increased onion productivity significantly and decreased the negative impact of water shortage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE gave the highest onion bulb yield and water-use efficiency, followed by YE+KH.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
YEe0
Outcome
bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
YE+KHe0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YE followed by YE+KH recorded the highest bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE gave the highest onion dry matter and NPK content and uptake, followed by YE+KH.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
YEe0
Outcome
dry matter content, NPK content, NPK uptakese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
YE+KHe0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YE followed by YE+KH recorded the highest bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yield, dry matter content, NPK content, NPK uptakes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE gave the highest onion protein yield, followed by YE+KH.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
YEe0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
YE+KHe0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YE followed by YE+KH recorded the highest bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yield, dry matter content, NPK content, NPK uptakes, protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE produced the highest soil water holding capacity, followed by YE+KH.

Treatment
YEe0
Outcome
soil water holding capacitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
YE+KHe0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“YE followed by YE+KH recorded the highest bulb yield, water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency for bulb dry yield, dry matter content, NPK content, NPK uptakes, protein yield and soil water holding capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KH gave the highest available soil NPK, EC and soluble ions, followed by YE+KH or YE.

Treatment
KHe0
Outcome
available soil NPK, EC and soluble ions valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
YE+KH or YEe0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“KH followed by YE+KH or YE recorded the highest available soil NPK, EC and soluble ions values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was lowest under KH or KH+YE.

Treatment
KH or KH+YEe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The pH lowest values were recorded in soil treated with KH or KH+YE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“control, yeast extract (YE), potassium humate (KH) and YE+KH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% ETc, YE reduced dry onion yield by only 3.18% relative to YE at 100% ETc.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
80% ETc with YE treatmente0
Outcome
dry onion yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3.18%e0
Qualifier
average for the two seasonse0
Comparator
100% ETc with YE treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing the 80% ETc with YE treatment and the 100% ETc with YE treatment, it was found that the amount of reduction in dry onion yield amounted to only 3.18% as an average for the two seasons with saving 20% of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE at 80% ETc saved 20% irrigation water against YE at 100% ETc.

Treatment
80% ETc with YE treatmente0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
100% ETc with YE treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing the 80% ETc with YE treatment and the 100% ETc with YE treatment, it was found that the amount of reduction in dry onion yield amounted to only 3.18% as an average for the two seasons with saving 20% of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YE at 80% ETc increased onion dry production by 24.36% relative to untreated plants at 100% ETc.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
YE at 80% ETce0
Outcome
onion dry productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
24.36%e0
Qualifier
average of two seasonse0
Comparator
untreated plants under 100% ETc irrigation levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion dry production was greater with YE at 80% ETc than with untreated plants under 100% ETc irrigation level by 24.36% as average of two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1397 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest YE or YE plus KH can improve soil fertility and plant water-stress tolerance.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
YE and or YE plus KHe0
Outcome
enhancing soil fertility and plant stress tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YE and or YE plus KH may be major factors in enhancing soil fertility and plant stress tolerance by insufficient irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

botanical · quality: grain · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.