Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Increasing Productivity and Fruit Quality of ‘Mutsu’ Apple Orchard by Dwarfing Treatments

Maria Małachowska; Tomasz Majak; Tomasz Krupa; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this 2022 study was to evaluate the effect of tree growth-limiting treatments on the tree yield and quality of ‘Mutsu’ apples. The experiment was established on 7-year-old trees on M.9 rootstock in a commercial orchard in Wilga near Warsaw. Growth-limiting treatments included unilateral root pruning, spraying the trees with Regalis Plus 10 WG at various times, and spraying with Flordimex 480 SL. Eight combinations were used, with four replicates of 20 trees per repetition. The measurements included fruit set, length of this year’s shoots, yield per tree, average fruit weight, and the size structure of the yield. The distinctive physiological status of the apples was assessed directly after harvest, directly after 8 months of storage under CA conditions (1.5% CO2, 1.5% O2, 1 °C, >92% RH) and after an additional 7 days of shelf-life. Spraying trees with Regalis Plus 10 WG from the balloon stage onwards, irrespective of the treatment with root pruning, was most effective in both inhibiting long-stem growth and increasing tree yield (by almost two times) by increasing the number of apples per tree. The growth response of long-stemmed apple trees to both unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spray was significantly lower than it was to Regalis Plus 10 WG spray and had relatively little effect on their yield. Regalis Plus 10 WG resulted in a clear reduction in average fruit weight (by about 100 g), which, in the case of the large-fruited cultivar ‘Mutsu’, should be seen as an advantage. Its application from the balloon stage onwards promoted higher apple firmness at harvest and after simulated handling preceded by long-term storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regalis Plus 10 WG applied from the balloon stage most effectively inhibited long-stem growth of apple trees.

Organ / stage
balloon stagee1
Treatment
Regalis Plus 10 WGe1
Outcome
inhibiting long-stem growthe1
Direction
most effectivee1
Qualifier
irrespective of the treatment with root pruninge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying trees with Regalis Plus 10 WG from the balloon stage onwards, irrespective of the treatment with root pruning, was most effective in both inhibiting long-stem growth and increasing tree yield (by almost two times) by increasing the number of apples per tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regalis Plus 10 WG applied from the balloon stage increased apple tree yield by almost two times, by increasing the number of apples per tree.

Treatment
Regalis Plus 10 WGe1
Outcome
tree yielde1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
almost two timese1
Qualifier
by increasing the number of apples per treee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying trees with Regalis Plus 10 WG from the balloon stage onwards, irrespective of the treatment with root pruning, was most effective in both inhibiting long-stem growth and increasing tree yield (by almost two times) by increasing the number of apples per tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth response of long-stemmed apple trees to unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spray was significantly lower than to Regalis Plus 10 WG spray.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae3
Treatment
unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spraye3
Outcome
growth responsee3
Direction
significantly lowere3
Comparator
Regalis Plus 10 WG spraye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The growth response of long-stemmed apple trees to both unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spray was significantly lower than it was to Regalis Plus 10 WG spray and had relatively little effect on their yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spray had relatively little effect on the yield of long-stemmed apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae3
Treatment
unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spraye3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The growth response of long-stemmed apple trees to both unilateral root pruning and Ethephon spray was significantly lower than it was to Regalis Plus 10 WG spray and had relatively little effect on their yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regalis Plus 10 WG reduced average fruit weight of ‘Mutsu’ apples by about 100 g, which is an advantage for the large-fruited cultivar.

Taxon
‘Mutsu’ Applet0
Material
large-fruited cultivar ‘Mutsu’e5
Treatment
Regalis Plus 10 WGe5
Outcome
average fruit weighte5
Direction
reductione5
Value
about 100 ge5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“‘Mutsu’ Apple Orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“Regalis Plus 10 WG resulted in a clear reduction in average fruit weight (by about 100 g), which, in the case of the large-fruited cultivar ‘Mutsu’, should be seen as an advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of Regalis Plus 10 WG from the balloon stage promoted higher apple firmness at harvest and after simulated handling.

Treatment
application from the balloon stage onwardse6
Outcome
apple firmness at harvest and after simulated handlinge6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Its application from the balloon stage onwards promoted higher apple firmness at harvest and after simulated handling preceded by long-term storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1663 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.