Paper · 2024 · PeerJ

Molecular and agro-morphological diversity assessment of some bread wheat genotypes and their crosses for drought tolerance

Mohamed A. Ezzat; Nahaa M. Alotaibi; Said S. Soliman; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat, a staple cereal crop, faces challenges due to climate change and increasing global population. Maintaining genetic diversity is vital for developing drought-tolerant cultivars. This study evaluated the genetic diversity and drought response of five wheat cultivars and their corresponding F1 hybrids under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Molecular profiling using ISSR and SCoT-PCR markers revealed 28 polymorphic loci out of 76 amplified. A statistically significant impact of parental genotypes and their crosses was observed on all investigated agro-morphological traits, including root length, root weight, shoot length, shoot weight, proline content, spikelet number/spike, spike length, grain number/spike, and grain weight/spike. The parental genotypes P1 and P3 had desirable positive and significant general combining ability (GCA) effects for shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot length, and root length under well-watered conditions, while P3 and P5 recorded the highest GCA estimates under drought stress. P3 and P4 showed the highest GCA effects for number of spikelets per spike, the number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spike under normal conditions. P5 presented the maximum GCA effects and proved to be the best combiner under drought stress conditions. The cross P1× P3 showed the highest positive specific combining ability (SCA) effects for shoot fresh weight under normal conditions, while P2×P3 excelled under water deficit conditions. P1× P2, P1 × P3, and P4× P5 were most effective for shoot dry weight under normal conditions, whereas P1×P3 and P3×P5 showed significant SCA effects under drought stress. Positive SCA effects for root fresh weight and shoot length were observed for P3×P5 under stressed conditions. Additionally, P4×P5 consistently recorded the highest SCA for root length in both environments, and P3×P5 excelled in the number of spikelets, grains per spike, and grain weight per spike under drought conditions. The evaluated genotypes were categorized based on their agronomic performance under drought stress into distinct groups ranging from drought-tolerant genotypes (group A) to drought-sensitive ones (group C). The genotypes P5, P2×P5, and P3×P5 were identified as promising genotypes to improve agronomic performance under water deficit conditions. The results demonstrated genetic variations for drought tolerance and highlighted the potential of ISSR and SCoT markers in wheat breeding programs for developing drought-tolerant cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental genotypes and their crosses significantly affected all investigated agro-morphological traits in bread wheat.

Material
parental genotypes and their crossese1
Outcome
agro-morphological traitse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“A statistically significant impact of parental genotypes and their crosses was observed on all investigated agro-morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR and SCoT-PCR markers revealed 28 polymorphic loci out of 76 amplified in the wheat genotypes.

Outcome
polymorphic locie2
Value
28 polymorphic loci out of 76 amplifiede2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“Molecular profiling using ISSR and SCoT-PCR markers revealed 28 polymorphic loci out of 76 amplified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental genotypes P1 and P3 had positive and significant GCA effects for shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight and root fresh weight under well-watered conditions.

Material
P1 and P3e3
Outcome
shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weighte3
Direction
positivee3
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“The parental genotypes P1 and P3 had desirable positive and significant general combining ability (GCA) effects for shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot length, and root length under well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1005 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental genotypes P1 and P3 had positive and significant GCA effects for root dry weight, shoot length and root length under well-watered conditions.

Material
P1 and P3e3
Outcome
root dry weight, shoot length, and root lengthe3
Direction
positivee3
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“The parental genotypes P1 and P3 had desirable positive and significant general combining ability (GCA) effects for shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot length, and root length under well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1005 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 and P5 recorded the highest GCA estimates under drought stress.

Material
P3 and P5e4
Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
GCA estimatese4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e4

“P3 and P5 recorded the highest GCA estimates under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1078 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 and P4 had the highest GCA effects for spikelet number, grain number and grain weight per spike under normal conditions.

Material
P3 and P4e5
Outcome
number of spikelets per spike, the number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spikee5
Direction
higheste5
Qualifier
normal conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“P3 and P4 showed the highest GCA effects for number of spikelets per spike, the number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spike under normal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P5 had the maximum GCA effects and was the best combiner under drought stress conditions.

Material
P5e6
Treatment
drought stress conditionse6
Outcome
GCA effectse6
Direction
maximume6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e6

“P5 presented the maximum GCA effects and proved to be the best combiner under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cross P1× P3 had the highest positive SCA effects for shoot fresh weight under normal conditions.

Material
P1× P3e7
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte7
Direction
highest positivee7
Qualifier
normal conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e7

“The cross P1× P3 showed the highest positive specific combining ability (SCA) effects for shoot fresh weight under normal conditions, while P2×P3 excelled under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cross P2×P3 excelled in specific combining ability under water deficit conditions.

Material
P2×P3e7
Treatment
water deficit conditionse7
Outcome
specific combining ability (SCA) effectse7
Direction
excellede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e7

“The cross P1× P3 showed the highest positive specific combining ability (SCA) effects for shoot fresh weight under normal conditions, while P2×P3 excelled under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crosses P1× P2, P1× P3 and P4× P5 were most effective for shoot dry weight under normal conditions.

Material
P1× P2, P1 × P3, and P4× P5e1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
most effectivee1
Qualifier
normal conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“P1× P2, P1 × P3, and P4× P5 were most effective for shoot dry weight under normal conditions, whereas P1×P3 and P3×P5 showed significant SCA effects under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The crosses P1× P3 and P3× P5 showed significant SCA effects for shoot dry weight under drought stress.

Material
P1×P3 and P3×P5e1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
SCA effectse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“P1× P2, P1 × P3, and P4× P5 were most effective for shoot dry weight under normal conditions, whereas P1×P3 and P3×P5 showed significant SCA effects under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cross P3×P5 had positive SCA effects for root fresh weight and shoot length under stressed conditions.

Material
P3×P5e1
Treatment
stressed conditionse1
Outcome
root fresh weight and shoot lengthe1
Direction
Positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Positive SCA effects for root fresh weight and shoot length were observed for P3×P5 under stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cross P4×P5 had the highest SCA for root length in both environments.

Material
P4×P5e1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
both environmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“P4×P5 consistently recorded the highest SCA for root length in both environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1908 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cross P3×P5 excelled in spikelet number, grain number and grain weight per spike under drought conditions.

Material
P3×P5e1
Treatment
drought conditionse1
Outcome
number of spikelets, grains per spike, and grain weight per spikee1
Direction
excellede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“P3×P5 excelled in the number of spikelets, grains per spike, and grain weight per spike under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated genotypes were grouped by agronomic performance under drought stress, from drought-tolerant (group A) to drought-sensitive (group C).

Material
evaluated genotypese1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
agronomic performance under drought stresse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“The evaluated genotypes were categorized based on their agronomic performance under drought stress into distinct groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2147 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The genotypes P5, P2×P5 and P3×P5 were identified as promising to improve agronomic performance under water deficit conditions.

Material
P5, P2×P5, and P3×P5e1
Treatment
water deficit conditionse1
Outcome
improve agronomic performancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“The genotypes P5, P2×P5, and P3×P5 were identified as promising genotypes to improve agronomic performance under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2372 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated wheat genotypes show genetic variation for drought tolerance.

Outcome
genetic variations for drought tolerancee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat, a staple cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results demonstrated genetic variations for drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2439 · show in text ↑