Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Research on Lightweight Rice False Smut Disease Identification Method Based on Improved YOLOv8n Model

Lulu Yang; Fuxu Guo; Hongze Zhang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to detect rice false smut quickly and accurately, a lightweight false smut detection model, YOLOv8n-MBS, was proposed in this study. The model introduces the C2f_MSEC module to replace C2f in the backbone network for better extraction of key features of false smut, enhances the feature fusion capability of the neck network for different sizes of false smut by using a weighted bidirectional feature pyramid network, and designs a group-normalized shared convolution lightweight detection head to reduce the number of parameters in the model head to achieve model lightweight. The experimental results show that YOLOv8n-MBS has an average accuracy of 93.9%, a parameter count of 1.4 M, and a model size of 3.3 MB. Compared with the SSD model, the average accuracy of the model in this study increased by 4%, the number of parameters decreased by 89.8%, and the model size decreased by 86.9%; compared with the YOLO series of YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv5n, YOLOv5s, and YOLOv8n models, the YOLOv8n-MBS model showed outstanding performance in terms of model accuracy and model performance detection; compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively. This method enables more accurate and lighter-weight detection of false smut, which provides the basis for intelligent management of rice blast disease in the field and thus promotes food security.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The YOLOv8n-MBS model had an average accuracy of 93.9% for rice false smut.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
average accuracye0
Value
93.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experimental results show that YOLOv8n-MBS has an average accuracy of 93.9%, a parameter count of 1.4 M, and a model size of 3.3 MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–722 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The YOLOv8n-MBS model had a parameter count of 1.4 M.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
parameter counte0
Value
1.4 Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experimental results show that YOLOv8n-MBS has an average accuracy of 93.9%, a parameter count of 1.4 M, and a model size of 3.3 MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–722 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The YOLOv8n-MBS model had a model size of 3.3 MB.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
model sizee0
Value
3.3 MBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experimental results show that YOLOv8n-MBS has an average accuracy of 93.9%, a parameter count of 1.4 M, and a model size of 3.3 MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–722 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the SSD model, the average accuracy of YOLOv8n-MBS increased by 4%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
average accuracye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4%e1
Comparator
SSD modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the SSD model, the average accuracy of the model in this study increased by 4%, the number of parameters decreased by 89.8%, and the model size decreased by 86.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–900 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the SSD model, the number of parameters of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 89.8%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
number of parameterse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
89.8%e1
Comparator
SSD modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the SSD model, the average accuracy of the model in this study increased by 4%, the number of parameters decreased by 89.8%, and the model size decreased by 86.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–900 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the SSD model, the model size of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 86.9%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
model sizee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
86.9%e1
Comparator
SSD modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the SSD model, the average accuracy of the model in this study increased by 4%, the number of parameters decreased by 89.8%, and the model size decreased by 86.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–900 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv9t, the average model accuracy of YOLOv8n-MBS increased by 2.8%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
average model accuracye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
2.8%e3
Comparator
YOLOv9te3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv10n, the average model accuracy of YOLOv8n-MBS increased by 2.2%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
average model accuracye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
2.2%e3
Comparator
YOLOv10ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv9t, the number of model parameters of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 30%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
number of model parameterse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
30%e3
Comparator
YOLOv9te3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv10n, the number of model parameters of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 39.1%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
number of model parameterse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
39.1%e3
Comparator
YOLOv10ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv9t, the model size of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 29.8%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
model sizee3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
29.8%e3
Comparator
YOLOv9te3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with YOLOv10n, the model size of YOLOv8n-MBS decreased by 43.1%.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
model sizee3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
43.1%e3
Comparator
YOLOv10ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the latest YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n models, the average model accuracy increased by 2.8% and 2.2%, the number of model parameters decreased by 30% and 39.1%, and the model size decreased by 29.8% and 43.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLOv8n-MBS showed outstanding performance in model accuracy and detection performance compared with the YOLO series of YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv5n, YOLOv5s and YOLOv8n.

Taxon
Rice False SmutUstilaginoidea virenst0
Outcome
model accuracy and model performance detectione2
Direction
outstanding performancee2
Comparator
YOLO series of YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv5n, YOLOv5s, and YOLOv8n modelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ustilaginoidea virens
Ustilaginoidea virens · TaxonEarlycj5 · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice False Smut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the YOLO series of YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv5n, YOLOv5s, and YOLOv8n models, the YOLOv8n-MBS model showed outstanding performance in terms of model accuracy and model performance detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1097 · show in text ↑