Paper · 2024 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY

'Candidatus Phytoplasma vignae’, assigning a species description to a long-known phytoplasma occurring in northern Australia

Bianca Rodrigues Jardim; Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen; Cherie Gambley; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Gene- and genome-based approaches were used to determine whether Vigna little leaf (ViLL) phytoplasma, which occurs in northern Australia, is a distinct ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma’ species. The ViLL 16S rRNA gene sequences exhibited the highest known similarity to species in the 16SrXXIX-A and 16SrIX-D subgroups, namely ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma omanense’ (98.03–98.10%) and ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (96.87–97.20%), respectively. A total of 48 single-copy orthologue genes were identified to be shared among the two draft ViLL phytoplasma genomes, 30 publicly available phytoplasma genomes, and one Acholeplasma laidlawii genome as the outgroup taxon. Phylogenomic assessments using the 48 shared single-copy orthologue genes supported that ViLL and ‘ Ca . Phytoplasma phoenicium’ were closely related yet distinct species. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and phylogenomic assessment indicate that ViLL phytoplasmas are a distinct taxon. As such, a novel species, ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma vignae’, is proposed. Strain BAWM-336 (genome accession number JAUZLI000000000) detected in Momordica charantia (bitter melon) serves as the reference strain of this species, with infected plant material deposited in the Victorian Plant Pathology Herbarium (VPRI) as VPRI 44369.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ViLL 16S rRNA sequences were most similar to Candidatus Phytoplasma omanense at 98.03–98.10%.

Taxon
ViLLe1
Gene
16S rRNAe0
Outcome
similaritye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
98.03–98.10%e0
Comparator
Candidatus Phytoplasma omanensee0

Verbatim

e0

“The ViLL 16S rRNA gene sequences exhibited the highest known similarity to species in the 16SrXXIX-A and 16SrIX-D subgroups, namely ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma omanense’ (98.03–98.10%) and ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (96.87–97.20%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–440 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vigna little leaf (ViLL) phytoplasma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ViLL 16S rRNA sequences had 96.87–97.20% similarity to Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium.

Taxon
ViLLe1
Gene
16S rRNAe0
Outcome
similaritye0
Value
96.87–97.20%e0
Comparator
Candidatus Phytoplasma phoeniciume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The ViLL 16S rRNA gene sequences exhibited the highest known similarity to species in the 16SrXXIX-A and 16SrIX-D subgroups, namely ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma omanense’ (98.03–98.10%) and ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (96.87–97.20%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–440 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vigna little leaf (ViLL) phytoplasma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-eight single-copy orthologue genes were shared across the two ViLL genomes, 30 public phytoplasma genomes and an Acholeplasma outgroup genome.

Taxon
ViLL phytoplasmae0
Outcome
single-copy orthologue genese0
Value
48e0
Qualifier
30 publicly available phytoplasma genomes, and one Acholeplasma laidlawii genome as the outgroup taxone0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 48 single-copy orthologue genes were identified to be shared among the two draft ViLL phytoplasma genomes, 30 publicly available phytoplasma genomes, and one Acholeplasma laidlawii genome as the outgroup taxon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenomics supported ViLL and Ca. Phytoplasma phoenicium as closely related but distinct species.

Taxon
ViLLe0
Outcome
closely related yet distinct speciese0
Comparator
Ca . Phytoplasma phoeniciume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phylogenomic assessments using the 48 shared single-copy orthologue genes supported that ViLL and ‘ Ca . Phytoplasma phoenicium’ were closely related yet distinct species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–834 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Candidatus Phytoplasma vignae was proposed as a new species.

Taxon
Candidatus Phytoplasma vignaeCandidatus Phytoplasma vignaee0
Outcome
a novel speciese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“As such, a novel species, ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma vignae’, is proposed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1025 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BAWM-336 detected in bitter melon is the reference strain, with infected material deposited as VPRI 44369.

Taxon
Candidatus Phytoplasma vignaeCandidatus Phytoplasma vignaee1
Material
BAWM-336e0
Interactor
Momordica charantiaMomordica charantiae0host
Outcome
reference straine0
Qualifier
VPRI 44369e0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · InteractorMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain BAWM-336 (genome accession number JAUZLI000000000) detected in Momordica charantia (bitter melon) serves as the reference strain of this species, with infected plant material deposited in the Victorian Plant Pathology Herbarium (VPRI) as VPRI 44369.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“a novel species, ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma vignae’, is proposed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1025 · show in text ↑