Paper · 2024 · Nitrogen

Effect of Time of Nitrogen Fertilization on Use of Root Reserves in Megathyrsus maximus Cultivars

Aline M. Motta; Luiz J. M. Motta; Lucas G. Mota; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen is a very important nutrient in grass maintenance fertilization and therefore must be applied at the appropriate moment. The objective of this study was to identify the most responsive moment to nitrogen fertilization and to verify if root mass and the content of carbohydrates and nitrogen in roots influence the moment of fertilization in cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum). This study was carried out simultaneously in a greenhouse using a completely randomized design, with sixteen treatments and five replications, in a 4×4 factorial design. The treatments consisted of four intervals between cultivar defoliation and nitrogen fertilization (0, 3, 6 and 9 days) and four Megathyrsus maximus cultivars, Mombasa, BRS Zuri, BRS Quenia and BRS Tamani, which were evaluated in five regrowth cycles. No difference in forage mass was observed among cultivars when fertilization was performed on days zero, three and nine after harvesting. On day nine, Mombasa showed a higher forage mass compared to BRS Tamani. Nitrogen content in the roots of Zuri decreased when fertilization was performed on the third day after defoliation, remaining constant in the other fertilization intervals. A linear reduction in root starch in BRS Zuri was observed, while in Mombasa cultivars, a linear increase was observed when fertilization was performed nine days after harvesting. Thus, nitrogen fertilization of BRS Tamani should be carried out closer to defoliation, while Mombasa, BRS Zuri and BRS Quenia can be fertilized up to nine days after harvesting, which results in greater flexibility regarding the moment of nitrogen fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage mass did not differ among Megathyrsus maximus cultivars when nitrogen was applied on days zero, three and nine after harvesting.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Treatment
fertilization was performed on days zero, three and nine after harvestinge1
Outcome
forage masse1
Direction
No differencee1
Comparator
among cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“No difference in forage mass was observed among cultivars when fertilization was performed on days zero, three and nine after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–965 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On day nine after defoliation, Mombasa had a higher forage mass than BRS Tamani.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
Mombasae2
Outcome
forage masse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
BRS Tamanie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“On day nine, Mombasa showed a higher forage mass compared to BRS Tamani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization on the third day after defoliation decreased nitrogen content in the roots of BRS Zuri.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
Zurie3
Organ / stage
rootse3
Treatment
fertilization was performed on the third day after defoliatione3
Outcome
Nitrogen contente3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
other fertilization intervalse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen content in the roots of Zuri decreased when fertilization was performed on the third day after defoliation, remaining constant in the other fertilization intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nitrogen content of BRS Zuri remained constant at the other fertilization intervals compared with the third day after defoliation.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
Zurie3
Organ / stage
rootse3
Treatment
other fertilization intervalse3
Outcome
Nitrogen contente3
Direction
remaining constante3
Comparator
third day after defoliatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen content in the roots of Zuri decreased when fertilization was performed on the third day after defoliation, remaining constant in the other fertilization intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root starch decreased linearly in BRS Zuri.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
BRS Zurie4
Organ / stage
roote4
Outcome
root starche4
Direction
reductione4
Qualifier
lineare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e4

“A linear reduction in root starch in BRS Zuri was observed, while in Mombasa cultivars, a linear increase was observed when fertilization was performed nine days after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1392 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root starch of Mombasa increased linearly when nitrogen was applied nine days after harvesting.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
Mombasae4
Organ / stage
roote4
Treatment
fertilization was performed nine days after harvestinge4
Outcome
root starche4
Direction
increasee4
Qualifier
lineare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e4

“A linear reduction in root starch in BRS Zuri was observed, while in Mombasa cultivars, a linear increase was observed when fertilization was performed nine days after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1392 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying nitrogen to BRS Tamani closer to defoliation.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
BRS Tamanie5
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione5
Outcome
closer to defoliatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e5

“nitrogen fertilization of BRS Tamani should be carried out closer to defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1480 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that Mombasa, BRS Zuri and BRS Quenia can be fertilized up to nine days after harvesting.

Taxon
Megathyrsus maximusMegathyrsus maximuse0
Material
Mombasa, BRS Zuri and BRS Queniae6
Outcome
fertilized up to nine days after harvestinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–405 · show in text ↑
e6

“Mombasa, BRS Zuri and BRS Quenia can be fertilized up to nine days after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1571 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Megathyrsus maximus (Guinea grass)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.