Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Physico-chemical properties of mango fruits cv. Alphonso as influenced by the post flowering foliar nutrition

KV Malshe; MS Shedge; RV Dhopavkar

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigation was carried out at Mango research Sub-Centre, Rameshwar, Sindhudurg during the season 2017-18 on uniformly growing, 30 years old Alphonso mango trees. The experiment was laid in RCBD design with three replications and seven treatments. The treatments included viz; Control (No spray), Urea (1 and 3%), Potassium nitrate (1 and 3%) and 19: 19: 19 NPK (1 and 3%). Two sprays were taken in each treatment as 1st spray at pea stage of fruit development and second spray was given at marble stage. The sigificantly maximum fruit length and breadth (9.27 cm and 7.97 cm, respectively) and highest fruit weight (245.33 g) were measured in T5 - KNO3 (3%) treatment. The least fruit weight (229.67 g) was recorded in Control (T1). At harvest stage, the highest T. S. S. (8.98 0B) was recorded in KNO3 (1%) treatment while at ripe stage, KNO3 (3%) exhibited highest T. S. S. (20.32 0B). The highest total sugars and ascorbic acid content (16.28% and 55.47 mg/ 100 g of fruit pulp, respectively) was found in KNO3 (3%) treatment. The spongy tissue intensity was significant reduced in the mango fruits by foliar nutrition. The lowest intensity (5.5 percent) was observed in KNO3 (3%) treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) produced maximum fruit length of 9.27 cm.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.27 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sigificantly maximum fruit length and breadth (9.27 cm and 7.97 cm, respectively) and highest fruit weight (245.33 g) were measured in T5 - KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) produced maximum breadth of 7.97 cm.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e0
Outcome
breadthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.97 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sigificantly maximum fruit length and breadth (9.27 cm and 7.97 cm, respectively) and highest fruit weight (245.33 g) were measured in T5 - KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) produced maximum fruit weight of 245.33 g.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
245.33 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sigificantly maximum fruit length and breadth (9.27 cm and 7.97 cm, respectively) and highest fruit weight (245.33 g) were measured in T5 - KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (1%) gave highest T. S. S. at harvest stage, 8.98 0B.

Organ / stage
harvest stagee1
Treatment
KNO3 (1%)e1
Outcome
T. S. S.e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
8.98 0Be1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest stage, the highest T. S. S. (8.98 0B) was recorded in KNO3 (1%) treatment while at ripe stage, KNO3 (3%) exhibited highest T. S. S. (20.32 0B).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) gave highest T. S. S. at ripe stage, 20.32 0B.

Organ / stage
ripe stagee1
Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e1
Outcome
T. S. S.e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
20.32 0Be1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest stage, the highest T. S. S. (8.98 0B) was recorded in KNO3 (1%) treatment while at ripe stage, KNO3 (3%) exhibited highest T. S. S. (20.32 0B).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) gave highest total sugars, 16.28%.

Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e2
Outcome
total sugarse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
16.28%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest total sugars and ascorbic acid content (16.28% and 55.47 mg/ 100 g of fruit pulp, respectively) was found in KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) gave highest ascorbic acid content, 55.47 mg/ 100 g of fruit pulp.

Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e2
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente2
Direction
higheste2
Value
55.47 mg/ 100 g of fruit pulpe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest total sugars and ascorbic acid content (16.28% and 55.47 mg/ 100 g of fruit pulp, respectively) was found in KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrition reduced spongy tissue intensity in mango fruit.

Treatment
foliar nutritione3
Outcome
spongy tissue intensitye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“The spongy tissue intensity was significant reduced in the mango fruits by foliar nutrition. The lowest intensity (5.5 percent) was observed in KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 (3%) had the lowest spongy tissue intensity at 5.5 percent.

Treatment
KNO3 (3%)e3
Outcome
intensitye3
Direction
loweste3
Value
5.5 percente3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango fruits cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“The spongy tissue intensity was significant reduced in the mango fruits by foliar nutrition. The lowest intensity (5.5 percent) was observed in KNO3 (3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1201 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

potassium nitrate · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.