Paper · 2024 · Sustainable Futures

Integrating rainfall index-based insurance with optimal crop management strategies can reduce financial risks for Australian dryland cotton farmers

Thong Nguyen-Huy; Jarrod Kath; Louis Kouadio; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought undermines the financial sustainability of farmers. While farmers have adopted various strategies to mitigate some drought impacts, they remain exposed to substantial drought risk. Insurance could be useful in managing climatic risks and for encouraging farmers to take sensible risks (e.g., changing their sowing date to increase yield), but it can be costly. Here, we tested whether the integration of a change in sowing date with rainfall index-based insurance could improve farmer profitability and income stability. We used the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM)-Cotton model to simulate cotton lint yields for various sowing dates, taking into account different management strategies, across three dry-land cotton research farm sites – Dalby, Goondiwindi, and Theodore – from 1940 to 2022. We designed the index-based insurance payout when the average rainfall received during the growing season falls below a predefined level, such as the 5th, 10th, or 20th percentile of rainfall. Our study, which involved 3.9 million cotton lint simulations and 3,000 rainfall index-based insurance products, showed that combining a shift in sowing date with insurance can lead to an income improvement of up to 21.5% at some study sites. Additionally, in drought years, the income improvement for farmers who combined optimal sowing dates with rainfall index-based insurance was up to 48.0%. The framework developed in this study could aid in devising financial strategies to enhance farming resilience during climate extremes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combining sowing-date shift and insurance improved income up to 21.5% at some sites.

Treatment
combining a shift in sowing date with insurancee0
Outcome
income improvemente0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
up to 21.5%e0
Qualifier
at some study sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining a shift in sowing date with insurance can lead to an income improvement of up to 21.5% at some study sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton lint yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In drought years optimal sowing date with insurance improved income up to 48.0%.

Treatment
combined optimal sowing dates with rainfall index-based insurancee0
Outcome
income improvemente0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
up to 48.0%e0
Qualifier
in drought yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in drought years, the income improvement for farmers who combined optimal sowing dates with rainfall index-based insurance was up to 48.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1407 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton lint yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–634 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The framework could help devise financial strategies for climate extremes.

Outcome
devising financial strategies to enhance farming resilience during climate extremese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The framework developed in this study could aid in devising financial strategies to enhance farming resilience during climate extremes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton lint yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–634 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.