Paper · 2024 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effect of different soil compositions and growth conditions on the corm production of Gladiolus grandiflorus L.

Sara Hamid Siddiqui; Syed Ghias Ali; Asad Ullah; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gladiolus grandiflorus L. is widely grown in most regions of Pakistan. However, propagules production per unit area is not sufficient. Therefore, pot experiments were undertaken at the Centre of Plant Biodiversity, University of Peshawar during 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 with the aim of investigating the effect of different soil compositions (substrates) and growth conditions on corms and cormels production. The experiment was performed according to two factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), repeated twice. For the first time four substrates, i.e. Clay+Silt (2:1), Farmyard manure (FYM)+Clay+Silt (1:1:1), Poultry manure (PM)+Clay+Silt (1:2:2) and PM+FYM+Clay+Silt (1:1:2:2), were used at different growth conditions, i.e. Control, Single lath, Double lath, Plastic and Double lath+Plastic, to explore their effects on corms yield. The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated number of leaves per plant, leaf area, chlorophyll content, spikes emergence, spike length, plant height, flowers opening, number of florets per spike, number of corms and cormels per plant, fresh weight and diameter of corms in both seasons. The PM+Clay+Silt substrate had shown negative results in the first season. However, this noxious effect was minimised during the second trial. Among growth conditions, Single lath shade significantly enhanced spike length and all corm yielding parameters. Thus, treatments of FYM+Clay+Silt (1:1:1) and Single lath shade were found to be effectual in obtaining the maximum number of corms and cormels of Gladiolus grandiflorus L. in the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt significantly increased leaf number, leaf area, and chlorophyll content in both seasons.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silte0
Outcome
number of leaves per plant, leaf area, chlorophyll contente0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated number of leaves per plant, leaf area, chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt significantly increased spike emergence, spike length, and plant height in both seasons.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silte1
Outcome
spikes emergence, spike length, plant heighte0
Direction
stimulatede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes emergence, spike length, plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–899 · show in text ↑
e2

“in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt significantly increased flower opening and florets per spike in both seasons.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silte1
Outcome
flowers opening, number of florets per spikee0
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowers opening, number of florets per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–899 · show in text ↑
e2

“in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt significantly increased corm and cormel number, and corm fresh weight, in both seasons.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silte1
Outcome
number of corms and cormels per plant, fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of corms and cormels per plant, fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt significantly increased corm diameter in both seasons.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silte1
Outcome
diameter of cormse0
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diameter of corms in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“The FYM+Clay+Silt substrate significantly stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PM+Clay+Silt had negative results in the first season.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
PM+Clay+Silte0
Outcome
negative resultse0
Qualifier
in the first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PM+Clay+Silt substrate had shown negative results in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The harmful effect of PM+Clay+Silt was reduced in the second trial.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
PM+Clay+Silte1
Outcome
noxious effecte0
Direction
minimisede0
Qualifier
during the second triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, this noxious effect was minimised during the second trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“The PM+Clay+Silt substrate had shown negative results in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single lath shade significantly increased spike length and all corm yielding parameters.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
Single lath shadee0
Outcome
spike length and all corm yielding parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single lath shade significantly enhanced spike length and all corm yielding parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+Clay+Silt and Single lath shade were recommended for maximum corm and cormel number in Peshawar.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandifloruse0
Treatment
FYM+Clay+Silt (1:1:1) and Single lath shadee0
Outcome
maximum number of corms and cormelse0
Setting
Peshaware0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of FYM+Clay+Silt (1:1:1) and Single lath shade were found to be effectual in obtaining the maximum number of corms and cormels of Gladiolus grandiflorus L. in the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1616 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusPositive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.