Paper · 2024 · Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects

Energy analysis, mass transfer, and rehydration kinetics of okra dried using evacuated tube solar dryer

Dhiraj Kumar Yadav; Vinkel Kumar Arora

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), like most fruits and vegetables, deteriorates quickly after harvesting due to its high moisture content and respiration rate. To preserve it and mitigate the post-harvest losses, a developed evacuated tube solar dryer (ETSD) with heat pipes was used to dry fresh okra. Thermal profiling of the ETSD was carried out to investigate the range of temperature gain inside the drying chamber. The effect of different blanching temperatures, viz. 70, 80, and 90°C, on drying characteristics and physical properties like color, water activity, and rehydration kinetics of okra were investigated. The energy efficiency of the collector ranged from 13.21% to 42.67%. Similarly, the convective mass transfer coefficient was calculated and ranged from 3.41 × 10−07 to 8.57 × 10−07 m/s. The okra blanched at 80°C, showing maximum greenness retention and lower water activity. The rehydration ratio was 6.05, 7.19, 7.73, and 7.41 for control, and okra blanched at 70, 80, and 90°C. The rehydration kinetics were analyzed using four distinct models: Peleg, Weibull, exponential, and first order. The Weibull model demonstrated the most accurate fit to the data. It is suggested that okra blanched at 80°C and dried under ETSD gives better retention of color and a higher mass transfer and rehydration rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The solar dryer collector had energy efficiency of 13.21% to 42.67%.

Outcome
energy efficiency of the collectore0
Value
13.21% to 42.67%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The energy efficiency of the collector ranged from 13.21% to 42.67%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–690 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The calculated convective mass transfer coefficient ranged from 3.41 × 10−07 to 8.57 × 10−07 m/s.

Outcome
convective mass transfer coefficiente0
Value
3.41 × 10−07 to 8.57 × 10−07 m/se0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the convective mass transfer coefficient was calculated and ranged from 3.41 × 10−07 to 8.57 × 10−07 m/s.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra blanched at 80°C retained maximum greenness and had lower water activity.

Treatment
blanched at 80°Ce0
Outcome
greenness retention and lower water activitye0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The okra blanched at 80°C, showing maximum greenness retention and lower water activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–896 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control okra had a rehydration ratio of 6.05.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
rehydration ratioe0
Value
6.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rehydration ratio was 6.05, 7.19, 7.73, and 7.41 for control, and okra blanched at 70, 80, and 90°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra blanched at 70°C had a rehydration ratio of 7.19.

Treatment
blanched at 70e0
Outcome
rehydration ratioe0
Value
7.19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rehydration ratio was 6.05, 7.19, 7.73, and 7.41 for control, and okra blanched at 70, 80, and 90°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra blanched at 80°C had a rehydration ratio of 7.73.

Treatment
blanched at 70, 80e0
Outcome
rehydration ratioe0
Value
7.73e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rehydration ratio was 6.05, 7.19, 7.73, and 7.41 for control, and okra blanched at 70, 80, and 90°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra blanched at 90°C had a rehydration ratio of 7.41.

Treatment
90°Ce0
Outcome
rehydration ratioe0
Value
7.41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rehydration ratio was 6.05, 7.19, 7.73, and 7.41 for control, and okra blanched at 70, 80, and 90°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Weibull model fit the rehydration data most accurately.

Outcome
accurate fit to the datae0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
Weibull modele0

Verbatim

e0

“The Weibull model demonstrated the most accurate fit to the data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1180 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 80°C blanching followed by solar drying for better color retention and higher mass transfer and rehydration rates.

Treatment
blanched at 80°C and dried under ETSDe0
Outcome
better retention of color and a higher mass transfer and rehydration ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is suggested that okra blanched at 80°C and dried under ETSD gives better retention of color and a higher mass transfer and rehydration rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1325 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.