Abstract
Background: The purpose of applying bacterial consortium and rice husk charcoal to corn plants is to determine the effect of the combination and whether it can control the intensity of downy mildew attacks and increase corn plant growth. Methods: This research was conducted at the experimental farm of the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. This research was conducted using two factors: the dose of rice husk charcoal application and the application of bacterial consortium with three replications using a randomized block design. The treatments were Charcoal husk (H): H5 = Charcoal husk @5 tons/ha, H10= Charcoal husk @10 tons, H15 Charcoal husk @15 tons/ha, Bacterial consortium (W): W0= without bacteria, WL = bacterial consortium 10 cc/l via foliar spraying, WS = bacterial consortium 10cc/l through soil, WLS = bacterial consortium 10cc/l through soil and foliar spraying Result: The results showed that the intensity of downy mildew attack on the combined application of the bacterial consortium and rice husk charcoal was lower than that of the no-combination treatment. The length and diameter of the plants that were treated with rice husk charcoal had a significant effect. Still, the application of the bacterial consortium had no effectand the number of leaves was not affected by the treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined bacterial consortium and rice husk charcoal lowered downy mildew attack intensity relative to no combination.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- combined application of the bacterial consortium and rice husk charcoale0
- Outcome
- intensity of downy mildew attacke0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- no-combination treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the intensity of downy mildew attack on the combined application of the bacterial consortium and rice husk charcoal was lower than that of the no-combination treatment”
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice husk charcoal significantly affected plant length and diameter, with direction unspecified.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- rice husk charcoale0
- Outcome
- length and diametere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The length and diameter of the plants that were treated with rice husk charcoal had a significant effect”
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial consortium had no reported effect on plant length and diameter.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- bacterial consortiume0
- Outcome
- effectande0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Still, the application of the bacterial consortium had no effectand the number of leaves was not affected by the treatment”
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf number was not affected by treatment.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- the treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the number of leaves was not affected by the treatment”
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
charcoal · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Oryza sativa · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.