Paper · 2024 · Environment Conservation Journal

Inoculation with PSB (phosphate-solubilizing bacteria) or Rhizobium in combination with NPK influenced the yield, quality and soil parameters of field pea

Boreddy Jagadeeswar Reddy; Suhail Fayaz; Tauseef Ahmad Bhat; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The yield and quality of field pea are directly influenced by inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB with NPK, which increase various parameters, such as the yield and quality of field pea. This research was conducted during the Rabi season in 2022-2023 at Lovely Professional University in the Punjab region of India. The yields of pea grain and stover are greatly increased by the use of 100% RDF (the recommended dose of fertilizer) with PSB and Rhizobium. In addition to the combination of Rhizobium, PSB and NPK increased the harvest index of field pea. The protein content and number of nodules were strongly affected by this treatment, which was more beneficial than the other treatments. Overall, the net return was greater in T7 (100% RDF+ PSB + Rhizobium). In addition, in comparison with the other treatments, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium also had positive effects on T7.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF with PSB and Rhizobium increased pea grain and stover yields.

Treatment
100% RDF (the recommended dose of fertilizer) with PSB and Rhizobiume0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yields of pea grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of pea grain and stover are greatly increased by the use of 100% RDF (the recommended dose of fertilizer) with PSB and Rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium, PSB and NPK increased field pea harvest index.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
combination of Rhizobium, PSB and NPKe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of Rhizobium, PSB and NPK increased the harvest index of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment strongly affected pea protein content and nodulation compared with other treatments.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
protein content and number of nodulese0
Direction
more beneficiale0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content and number of nodules were strongly affected by this treatment, which was more beneficial than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return was greater under T7 with 100% RDF, PSB and Rhizobium.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T7 (100% RDF+ PSB + Rhizobium)e0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the net return was greater in T7 (100% RDF+ PSB + Rhizobium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were more favorable under T7 than other treatments.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume0
Direction
positive effectse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“in comparison with the other treatments, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium also had positive effects on T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–154 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.