Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of different nutrient management on yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Dusengimana Patrick; Ishwar Singh; MK Rana; et al.

13
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was undertaken at the Research Farm of the Agriculture Department, Maharishi Markandeshwar (DU), Mullana-Ambala during Rabi season of 2022-23. The experiment used a randomized block design with eight treatments: control (T1), 100% NPK (T2), 100% NPK + Zinc at 2.5 kg ha-1 (T3), 100% NPK + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T4), 100% NPK + Vermicompost (VC) at 1 t ha-1 (T5), 100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6), 100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 2.5 kg ha-1 (T7), and 100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T8). The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022 at 22.5 cm row spacing by using a seed rate of 100 kg ha-1. The study's key findings showed that T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1). Treatment T8 also demonstrated superior results with significant grain yield (50.50 q ha-1), straw yield (61.70 q ha-1), highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) and benefit-cost ratio (2.13). Statistical analysis using OPSTAT software confirmed that integrating vermicompost and chemical fertilizers resulted in higher yields and economic benefits compared to control and solely chemical treatments. The combination of 100% NPK with VC and Zinc also improved wheat crop production highlighting the advantage of integrated nutrient management. Conclusion, the study recommends the application of either T6 or T8 for optimal yield and economic returns in wheat cultivation, enhancing productivity and supporting sustainable agriculture by improving soil health and resource use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
count of effective tillerse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
429 m-2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum spike length (11.1 cm) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
spike lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
11.1 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum count of grains per spike (54.67) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
count of grains per spikee1
Direction
maximume1
Value
54.67e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum grain yield (54.24 q ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
54.24 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum straw yield (62.86 q ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
62.86 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
gross returne1
Direction
maximume1
Value
Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (100% NPK + vermicompost 2 t/ha) gave the maximum net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1e2
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
maximume1
Value
Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T6 produced the maximum count of effective tillers (429 m-2), spike length (11.1 cm), count of grains per spike (54.67), grain yield (54.24 q ha-1), straw yield (62.86 q ha-1), and the maximum gross return (Rs. 154,554.8 ha-1) and net return (Rs. 103,737.3 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–949 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% NPK + VC at 2 t ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 (100% NPK + vermicompost 1 t/ha + zinc 5 kg/ha) gave superior grain yield (50.50 q ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
superiore5
Value
50.50 q ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–515 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatment T8 also demonstrated superior results with significant grain yield (50.50 q ha-1), straw yield (61.70 q ha-1), highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) and benefit-cost ratio (2.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 (100% NPK + vermicompost 1 t/ha + zinc 5 kg/ha) gave superior straw yield (61.70 q ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
straw yielde5
Direction
superiore5
Value
61.70 q ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–515 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatment T8 also demonstrated superior results with significant grain yield (50.50 q ha-1), straw yield (61.70 q ha-1), highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) and benefit-cost ratio (2.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 (100% NPK + vermicompost 1 t/ha + zinc 5 kg/ha) gave highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
1000-grain weighte5
Direction
higheste5
Value
46.7 ge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–515 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatment T8 also demonstrated superior results with significant grain yield (50.50 q ha-1), straw yield (61.70 q ha-1), highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) and benefit-cost ratio (2.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 (100% NPK + vermicompost 1 t/ha + zinc 5 kg/ha) gave highest benefit-cost ratio (2.13) in wheat.

Treatment
100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
2.13e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The seed of wheat cv. HD-3086 (Pusa Gutami) was sown on 16 November 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% NPK + VC at 1 t ha-1 + Zinc at 5 kg ha-1 (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–515 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatment T8 also demonstrated superior results with significant grain yield (50.50 q ha-1), straw yield (61.70 q ha-1), highest 1000-grain weight (46.7 g) and benefit-cost ratio (2.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating vermicompost and chemical fertilizers gave higher wheat yields and economic benefits than control and solely chemical treatments.

Treatment
integrating vermicompost and chemical fertilizerse6
Outcome
yields and economic benefitse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
control and solely chemical treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–94 · show in text ↑
e6

“Statistical analysis using OPSTAT software confirmed that integrating vermicompost and chemical fertilizers resulted in higher yields and economic benefits compared to control and solely chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1344 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying either T6 or T8 for optimal wheat yield and economic returns.

Outcome
application of either T6 or T8e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the study recommends the application of either T6 or T8 for optimal yield and economic returns in wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1616 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.