Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Does late water deficit induce root growth or senescence in wheat?

Kanwal Shazadi; John T. Christopher; Karine Chenu

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In crops like wheat, terminal drought is one of the principal stress factors limiting productivity in rain-fed systems. However, little is known about root development after heading, when water uptake can be critical to wheat crops. The impact of water-stress on root growth was investigated in two wheat cultivars, Scout and Mace, under well-watered and post-anthesis water stress in three experiments. Plants were grown outside in 1.5-m long pots at a density similar to local recommended farming practice. Differences in root development were observed between genotypes, especially for water stress conditions under which Scout developed and maintained a larger root system than Mace. While under well-watered conditions both genotypes had shallow roots that appeared to senesce after heading, a moderate water stress stimulated shallow-root growth in Scout but accelerated senescence in Mace. For deep roots, post-heading biomass growth was observed for both genotypes in well-watered conditions, while under moderate water stress, only Scout maintained net growth as Mace deep roots senesced. Water stress of severe intensity affected both genotypes similarly, with root senescence at all depths. Senescence was also observed above ground. Under well-watered conditions, Scout retained leaf greenness (i.e. stay-green phenotype) for slightly longer than Mace. The difference between genotypes accentuated under moderate water stress, with rapid post-anthesis leaf senescence in Mace while Scout leaf greenness was affected little if at all by the stress. As an overall result, grain biomass per plant ('yield') was similar in the two genotypes under well-watered conditions, but more affected by a moderate stress in Mace than Scout. The findings from this study will assist improvement in modelling root systems of crop models, development of relevant phenotyping methods and selection of cultivars with better adaptation to drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, Scout developed and maintained a larger root system than Mace.

Material
Scoute0
Outcome
root systeme0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
Macee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under which Scout developed and maintained a larger root system than Mace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under well-watered conditions both cultivars had shallow roots that appeared to senesce after heading.

Outcome
shallow roots that appeared to senesce after headinge0
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under well-watered conditions both genotypes had shallow roots that appeared to senesce after heading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress stimulated shallow-root growth in Scout.

Material
Scoute0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
shallow-root growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a moderate water stress stimulated shallow-root growth in Scout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress accelerated shallow-root senescence in Mace.

Material
Macee0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a moderate water stress stimulated shallow-root growth in Scout but accelerated senescence in Mace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-root biomass grew after heading in both cultivars when well watered.

Outcome
post-heading biomass growthe0
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-heading biomass growth was observed for both genotypes in well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water stress, Scout maintained net deep-root growth.

Material
Scoute0
Outcome
net growthe0
Qualifier
moderate water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate water stress, only Scout maintained net growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water stress, Mace deep roots senesced.

Material
Macee0
Outcome
deep roots senescede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mace deep roots senesced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress caused root senescence at all depths in both cultivars.

Treatment
Water stress of severe intensitye0
Outcome
root senescence at all depthse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress of severe intensity affected both genotypes similarly, with root senescence at all depths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scout retained leaf greenness slightly longer than Mace when well watered.

Material
Scoute0
Outcome
leaf greennesse0
Direction
slightly longere0
Comparator
Macee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under well-watered conditions, Scout retained leaf greenness (i.e. stay-green phenotype) for slightly longer than Mace.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress caused rapid post-anthesis leaf senescence in Mace.

Material
Macee0
Outcome
rapid post-anthesis leaf senescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rapid post-anthesis leaf senescence in Mace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate stress affected Scout leaf greenness little if at all.

Material
Scoute0
Treatment
moderate water stresse1
Outcome
leaf greennesse0
Direction
affected little if at alle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Scout leaf greenness was affected little if at all by the stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1558 · show in text ↑
e1

“The difference between genotypes accentuated under moderate water stress, with rapid post-anthesis leaf senescence in Mace while Scout leaf greenness was affected little if at all by the stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain biomass per plant was similar between cultivars when well watered.

Outcome
grain biomass per plante0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain biomass per plant ('yield') was similar in the two genotypes under well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate stress affected Mace grain biomass more than Scout grain biomass.

Material
Macee0
Outcome
grain biomass per plante1
Direction
more affectede0
Comparator
Scoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more affected by a moderate stress in Mace than Scout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1737 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain biomass per plant ('yield') was similar in the two genotypes under well-watered conditions, but more affected by a moderate stress in Mace than Scout.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.