Paper · 2024 · Current Plant Biology

Brassinosteroid-induced transcriptomic rearrangements unveiled the physiological mechanism of chromium stress tolerance in Brassica napus

Xiaofen Wu; Lan Li; Fakhir Hannan; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Brassinosteroid (BR), a plant hormone regulating growth, development, and stress responses, emerges as a promising tool for maintaining agricultural production under abiotic stress conditions. In this study, we conducted RNA-seq profiling and morpho-physiological analysis to investigate the molecular cross-talk involved in 24-epibrassinolide (EBR) mediating alleviation of chromium (Cr) stress. EBR inhibited Cr accumulation and reversed Cr-induced phytotoxicity, thereby promoting plant growth. The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a, electron transport rate (ETR) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were significantly higher in EBR+Cr treated plants compared to Cr alone. EBR application facilitated the recovery from Cr-induced structural deformities, including the disintegration of cell walls and membranes. Furthermore, under Cr stress, EBR application reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and accumulation. The levels of glutathione reductase (GR) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes were notably higher in plants subjected to EBR application following Cr stress. In addition, we established a transcriptomic database comprising 2345 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (1255 upregulated and 1090 downregulated) as a result of EBR application under Cr stress. The transcriptome analysis unveiled key DEGs and the associated pathways, emphasizing the importance of defense responses, genes encoding photosystem I and II, jasmonate signaling, aquaporins, ABC transporters, and cell wall biogenesis-related genes in the response of EBR to Cr stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR inhibited Cr accumulation under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBRe0
Outcome
Cr accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EBR inhibited Cr accumulation and reversed Cr-induced phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR reversed chromium-induced phytotoxicity.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBRe0
Outcome
Cr-induced phytotoxicitye0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EBR inhibited Cr accumulation and reversed Cr-induced phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR promoted plant growth under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBRe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EBR inhibited Cr accumulation and reversed Cr-induced phytotoxicity, thereby promoting plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigments were significantly higher with EBR plus Cr than Cr alone.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR+Cre0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Cr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a, electron transport rate (ETR) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were significantly higher in EBR+Cr treated plants compared to Cr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll fluorescence a was significantly higher with EBR plus Cr than Cr alone.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR+Cre0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence ae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Cr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a, electron transport rate (ETR) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were significantly higher in EBR+Cr treated plants compared to Cr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate was significantly higher with EBR plus Cr than Cr alone.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR+Cre0
Outcome
electron transport rate (ETR)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Cr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a, electron transport rate (ETR) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were significantly higher in EBR+Cr treated plants compared to Cr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-photochemical quenching was significantly higher with EBR plus Cr than Cr alone.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR+Cre0
Outcome
non-photochemical quenching (NPQ)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Cr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a, electron transport rate (ETR) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were significantly higher in EBR+Cr treated plants compared to Cr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR facilitated recovery from chromium-induced cell-wall and membrane deformities.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
cell walls and membranese0
Treatment
EBR applicatione0
Outcome
Cr-induced structural deformitiese0
Direction
recoverye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EBR application facilitated the recovery from Cr-induced structural deformities, including the disintegration of cell walls and membranes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR reduced malondialdehyde under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR applicatione0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under Cr stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cr stress, EBR application reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR reduced ROS production and accumulation under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR applicatione0
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under Cr stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cr stress, EBR application reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione reductase levels were notably higher after EBR application under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR applicatione0
Gene
glutathione reductase (GR)e0
Outcome
levels of glutathione reductase (GR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of glutathione reductase (GR) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes were notably higher in plants subjected to EBR application following Cr stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities were notably higher after EBR application under chromium stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR applicatione0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of glutathione reductase (GR) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes were notably higher in plants subjected to EBR application following Cr stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR under Cr stress yielded 2345 DEGs, including 1255 upregulated genes.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
EBR application under Cr stresse0
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
2345e0
Qualifier
1255 upregulated and 1090 downregulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we established a transcriptomic database comprising 2345 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (1255 upregulated and 1090 downregulated) as a result of EBR application under Cr stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome analysis identified defense, photosystem, jasmonate, aquaporin, ABC transporter and cell-wall pathways in the EBR response to Cr stress.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Gene
genes encoding photosystem I and IIe0
Outcome
key DEGs and the associated pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transcriptome analysis unveiled key DEGs and the associated pathways, emphasizing the importance of defense responses, genes encoding photosystem I and II, jasmonate signaling, aquaporins, ABC transporters, and cell wall biogenesis-related genes in the response of EBR to Cr stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑

chromium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

24-epi-brassinolide · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.