Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Impingement of NPK and Rhizobium on Physico-chemical Properties of Soil under Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Yashveer Yadav; Tarence Thomas; Narendra Swaroop; et al.

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study pertaining to the present topic under field investigation entitled “effect of different levels of NPK and Rhizobium on Physico-chemical properties of soil, growth and yield attributes of cluster bean” beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry. The excavated soil sample from experimental site before conducting research operation, mentioned that, the land topography range was nearly levelled with 1-3% slope, soil is of sandy loam texture with neutral to alkaline in reaction (7.140), electrical conductivity was non-saline (0.346 dS m-1) in nature, low organic carbon content (0.38%), low to medium available N (261.39 kg ha-1), available P (14.60 kg ha- 1) and available K (193.99 kg ha-1). Among nine treatments, during field experimentation, the conjunctive use of NPK and different Rhizobium levels, together come with best results significantly. However, the physical and chemical soil parameters, cumulative mean value for Bulk density (1.42 Mg m-3 and 1.45 Mg m-3),Particle density (2.64 Mg m-3 and 2.66 Mg m-3) and Soil pH (7.140 and 7.370) was found optimum in T1 (Absolute control) at 0-15 cm depth and 15-30 cm depth, respectively. Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available N was highest, at 284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Available Ne0
Direction
optimume0
Value
284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available P was highest, at 22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Available Pe0
Direction
optimume0
Value
22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available K was highest, at 210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Available Ke0
Direction
optimume0
Value
210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage porespace was highest, at 45.17% and 43.17%, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Percentage porespacee0
Direction
optimume0
Value
45.17% and 43.17%e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water holding capacity was highest, at 42.32% and 39.70%, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Water holding capacitye0
Direction
optimume0
Value
42.32% and 39.70%e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrical conductivity was highest, at 0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Electrical conductivitye0
Direction
optimume0
Value
0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage organic carbon was highest, at 0.49% and 0.46%, in T9 (100% NPK + 100% Rhizobium) compared with other NPK and Rhizobium levels.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobiume0
Outcome
Percentage organic carbone0
Direction
optimume0
Value
0.49% and 0.46%e0
Comparator
other NPK and Rhizobium levelse0
Setting
Research Farme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage porespace (45.17% and 43.17%), Water holding capacity (42.32% and 39.70%), Electrical conductivity (0.323 dS m-1 and 0.300 dS m-1), Percentage organic carbon (0.49% and 0.46%), Available N (284.41 kg ha-1 and 281.48 kg ha- 1 ), Available P (22.54 kg ha-1 and 21.29 kg ha-1 ), Available K (210.52 kg ha-1 and 203.98 kg ha-1 ) were found optimum in T9 consisting of (@ 100% NPK + @ 100% Rhizobium) in comparison to other NPK and Rhizobium levels application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density was optimum, at 1.42 and 1.45 Mg m-3, in T1 (absolute control).

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
T1 (Absolute control)e2
Outcome
Bulk densitye2
Direction
optimume2
Value
1.42 Mg m-3 and 1.45 Mg m-3e2
Setting
Research Farme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
e2

“cumulative mean value for Bulk density (1.42 Mg m-3 and 1.45 Mg m-3),Particle density (2.64 Mg m-3 and 2.66 Mg m-3) and Soil pH (7.140 and 7.370) was found optimum in T1 (Absolute control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Particle density was optimum, at 2.64 and 2.66 Mg m-3, in T1 (absolute control).

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
T1 (Absolute control)e2
Outcome
Particle densitye2
Direction
optimume2
Value
2.64 Mg m-3 and 2.66 Mg m-3e2
Setting
Research Farme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
e2

“cumulative mean value for Bulk density (1.42 Mg m-3 and 1.45 Mg m-3),Particle density (2.64 Mg m-3 and 2.66 Mg m-3) and Soil pH (7.140 and 7.370) was found optimum in T1 (Absolute control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was optimum, at 7.140 and 7.370, in T1 (absolute control).

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
T1 (Absolute control)e2
Outcome
Soil pHe2
Direction
optimume2
Value
7.140 and 7.370e2
Setting
Research Farme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“beginning from kharif seasons of the years 2023 at Research Farm, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–330 · show in text ↑
e2

“cumulative mean value for Bulk density (1.42 Mg m-3 and 1.45 Mg m-3),Particle density (2.64 Mg m-3 and 2.66 Mg m-3) and Soil pH (7.140 and 7.370) was found optimum in T1 (Absolute control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–119 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.