Abstract
The main key to the formation of the maximum yield of agricultural crops in general, and of soybeans in particular, is the index of the leaf surface area. Providing plants with a full range of mineral nutrition elements and foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizer significantly affect the indicator of the size of the assimilation surface and the intensity of its growth. Foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizers and applying mineral fertilizers in different doses according to research results is quite an effective way to ensure optimal nutrition of plants. The results of research on the study of the photosynthetic productivity of soybean varieties under the influence of different doses of mineral fertilizers and different periods of foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizer (foliar fertilizing in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf, foliar fertilizing in the phase of budding) in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe are presented. The peculiarities of the formation of the leaf surface area of soybean plants have been established. It was found that the dose of mineral fertilizers and the timing of foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizer Helprost Soybean (2.0 l/ha) had a significant impact on this indicator. The use of foliar fertilizing with Helprost Soybean in the budding phase ensured an increase in the leaf surface area by 7.2 - 12.7% in the Onyx variety and, accordingly, by 8.6 - 13.3% in the Sensor variety. Based on the results of research, it was found that the most effective technological technique was the combination of foliar feeding in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf with Helprost Soybean with foliar feeding with the same organo-mineral fertilizer in the budding phase. Such growing conditions contributed to an increase in the area of leaves in comparison with variants without treatment by 10.6-17.9% in the Onyx variety and 12.3-18.2% in the Sensor variety. According to the results of the observations and calculations, it was found that the photosynthetic potential of soybean crops increased dynamically during the entire growing season and was directly dependent on the doses of mineral fertilizers, foliar fertilizing with organic-mineral fertilizers, and the weather conditions of the year. Together with mineral fertilizers, foliar feeding in different phases of the growing season of soybean crops had a positive effect on the formation of the photosynthetic potential of crops.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer dose and Helprost Soybean foliar timing significantly affected soybean leaf area.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- dose of mineral fertilizers and the timing of foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizer Helprost Soybean (2.0 l/ha)e0
- Outcome
- this indicatore0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the dose of mineral fertilizers and the timing of foliar fertilizing with organo-mineral fertilizer Helprost Soybean (2.0 l/ha) had a significant impact on this indicator.”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Budding phase Helprost Soybean foliar feeding increased leaf area in Onyx by 7.2 - 12.7%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Onyxe0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizing with Helprost Soybean in the budding phasee0
- Outcome
- leaf surface areae0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.2 - 12.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of foliar fertilizing with Helprost Soybean in the budding phase ensured an increase in the leaf surface area by 7.2 - 12.7% in the Onyx variety”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Budding phase Helprost Soybean foliar feeding increased leaf area in Sensor by 8.6 - 13.3%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Sensore0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizing with Helprost Soybean in the budding phasee1
- Outcome
- leaf surface areae1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 8.6 - 13.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“and, accordingly, by 8.6 - 13.3% in the Sensor variety.”
e1“The use of foliar fertilizing with Helprost Soybean in the budding phase ensured an increase in the leaf surface area”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Feeding with Helprost Soybean at the third trifoliate leaf and budding phases was the most effective technique.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- combination of foliar feeding in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf with Helprost Soybean with foliar feeding with the same organo-mineral fertilizer in the budding phasee0
- Outcome
- most effective technological techniquee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most effective technological technique was the combination of foliar feeding in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf with Helprost Soybean with foliar feeding with the same organo-mineral fertilizer in the budding phase.”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined third trifoliate and budding phase feeding increased Onyx leaf area by 10.6-17.9% versus untreated variants.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Onyxe0
- Treatment
- Such growing conditionse0
- Outcome
- area of leavese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 10.6-17.9%e0
- Comparator
- variants without treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Such growing conditions contributed to an increase in the area of leaves in comparison with variants without treatment by 10.6-17.9% in the Onyx variety”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined third trifoliate and budding phase feeding increased Sensor leaf area by 12.3-18.2% versus untreated variants.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Sensore0
- Treatment
- combination of foliar feeding in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf with Helprost Soybean with foliar feeding with the same organo-mineral fertilizer in the budding phasee1
- Outcome
- area of leavese2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 12.3-18.2%e0
- Comparator
- variants without treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“and 12.3-18.2% in the Sensor variety.”
e1“the combination of foliar feeding in the phase of the 3rd trifoliate leaf with Helprost Soybean with foliar feeding with the same organo-mineral fertilizer in the budding phase”
e2“an increase in the area of leaves in comparison with variants without treatment”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean photosynthetic potential increased dynamically throughout the growing season.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic potentiale0
- Direction
- increased dynamicallye0
- Qualifier
- during the entire growing seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the photosynthetic potential of soybean crops increased dynamically during the entire growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean photosynthetic potential depended on mineral fertilizer doses.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- doses of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic potentiale1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was directly dependent on the doses of mineral fertilizers, foliar fertilizing with organic-mineral fertilizers, and the weather conditions of the year.”
e1“photosynthetic potential of soybean crops”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean photosynthetic potential depended on foliar fertilizer application.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizing with organic-mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic potentiale1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was directly dependent on the doses of mineral fertilizers, foliar fertilizing with organic-mineral fertilizers, and the weather conditions of the year.”
e1“photosynthetic potential of soybean crops”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean photosynthetic potential depended on annual weather conditions.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic potentiale1
- Setting
- weather conditions of the yeare0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was directly dependent on the doses of mineral fertilizers, foliar fertilizing with organic-mineral fertilizers, and the weather conditions of the year.”
e1“photosynthetic potential of soybean crops”
t0“SOYBEAN VARIETIES”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding alongside mineral fertilizer positively affected soybean photosynthetic potential.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- foliar feeding in different phases of the growing seasone0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic potential of cropse0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Together with mineral fertilizers, foliar feeding in different phases of the growing season of soybean crops had a positive effect on the formation of the photosynthetic potential of crops.”
The same questions in other papers
climate site · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
micronutrient · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.