Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Impact of Photosynthetic Efficiency on Watermelon Cultivation in the Face of Drought

Dayane Mércia Ribeiro Silva; Allan Cunha Barros; Ricardo Barros Silva; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water availability is a limiting factor for plant production, especially in Brazilian semi-arid regions. The main aim of the study was to investigate the physiological effects of drought during the fruiting stage of watermelon cultivation. A completely randomized block design with four replications and six treatments varied by the number of lateral drip tapes (1 or 2) and the duration of drought stress (0, 4, and 8 days) was used. The following parameters were evaluated: relative chlorophyll content, relative leaf water content, electrolyte leakage, CO2 assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), internal CO2 concentration, leaf temperature, transpiration (E), water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE), yield, thickness, diameter, length, and fruit °brix, at 4 and 8 days of drought. Drought negatively affected photosynthesis, particularly in treatments with a single dripper and 4 days of drought, resulting in reductions of up to 60% in A, 68% in gs, 44% in E, 58% in WUE, and 59% in CE, but did not have a significant effect on watermelon yield after 4 or 8 days of irrigation. It was concluded that drought influences the physiological responses of watermelon plants, mainly in reducing photosynthesis, but does not drastically affect fruit productivity in short periods of stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced CO2 assimilation by up to 60%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
Ae0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions of up to 60% in A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stomatal conductance by up to 68%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
gse0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“68% in gs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced transpiration by up to 44%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
Ee0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“44% in E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced water use efficiency by up to 58%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
WUEe0
Value
58%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“58% in WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced carboxylation efficiency by up to 59%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
CEe0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“59% in CE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought had no significant effect on yield after 4 or 8 days.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
watermelon yielde0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not have a significant effect on watermelon yield after 4 or 8 days of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.