Paper · 2024 · Phytopathology

Effect of Quantitative Wheat Resistance on the Aggressiveness of Fusarium graminearum

Mara J. Krone; Yanhong Dong; Santiago X. Mideros

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Little is known about the selection pressures acting on plant pathogen populations, especially those applied by quantitative forms of resistance. Fusarium graminearum causes Fusarium head blight in wheat, producing significant yield losses and mycotoxin contamination. Quantitative host resistance is the best method to control Fusarium head blight. However, there needs to be more understanding of how disease resistance affects the evolution of plant pathogens. The aim of this study was to determine if the presence or absence of wheat resistance influenced the fitness components and genomic regions of F. graminearum. Thirty-one isolates from highly susceptible and 25 isolates from moderately resistant wheat lines were used. Isolate aggressiveness was measured by the area under the disease progress curve, visually damaged kernels, and deoxynivalenol contamination. The in vitro growth rate and spore production were also measured. Two whole-genome scans for selection were conducted with 333,297 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. One scan looked for signatures of selection in the entire sample, and the other scan was for divergent selection between the isolates from moderately resistant wheat and highly susceptible wheat. The subsample of isolates from highly susceptible wheat was primarily aggressive. Several regions of the F. graminearum genome with signatures for selection were identified. The moderately resistant wheat varieties used in this study did not select more aggressive isolates, suggesting that quantitative resistance is a durable method to control Fusarium head blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates from highly susceptible wheat were primarily aggressive.

Material
highly susceptible wheate0
Outcome
isolates from highly susceptible wheat was primarily aggressivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The subsample of isolates from highly susceptible wheat was primarily aggressive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several F. graminearum genome regions showed signatures of selection.

Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
regions of the F. graminearum genome with signatures for selectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several regions of the F. graminearum genome with signatures for selection were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium head blight in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–203 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately resistant wheat varieties did not select more aggressive isolates.

Material
moderately resistant wheat varietiese0
Outcome
aggressive isolatese0
Direction
did not selecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The moderately resistant wheat varieties used in this study did not select more aggressive isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that quantitative resistance is a durable way to control Fusarium head blight.

Outcome
quantitative resistance is a durable method to control Fusarium head blighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quantitative resistance is a durable method to control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1600 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium head blight in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–203 · show in text ↑