Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed seed bank and dynamics in wheat as affected by sowing time and rice residue management methods

Ramanpreet Kaur; JS Deol; Navjyot Kaur; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were carried out to evaluate the effect of sowing time and residue management methods of preceding rice varieties (with different residue load) on weed seed bank and density in wheat during Rabi 2019-20 and 2020-21 in Punjab. Experiment was conducted in split plot design keeping combinations of 2 preceding rice varieties with different residue loads and 2 sowing times in main plots and 4 residue management methods in sub-plots with 3 replications. Results revealed that weed population and biomass at 30 days after sowing was higher in fields with low residue load (6.96-7.89 t/ha of PR 126) as compared to high residue load (10.25-11.44 t/ha of PR 122). Population and biomass of Medicago denticulata was lower in 15th November sown wheat in contrast to other broad-leaf weeds. Lower density of Phalaris minor was recorded under early sown wheat (25th October). Weed density and biomass was lower under happy seeder as compared to other residue management methods. In mould board plough + rotavator treatment, weed seed per unit area was lower in 0-5 cm soil layer but it was higher at 10-15 cm soil depth as compared to other residue management methods. Crop growth parameters (plant height, tillers density and biomass) were not influenced by rice residue load and wheat planting time. Grain yield was recorded highest under early sown wheat as compared to late sown wheat. Grain yield was recorded highest under Happy Seeder as compared to other residue management system during second year. However, grain yield was recorded similar under all residue management methods during first year. The results suggested that grass weeds were less in 25th October sown wheat but 15th November sown crop has less broad-leaf weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed population and biomass were higher with low than high rice residue load.

Organ / stage
30 days after sowinge0
Treatment
low residue loade0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed population and biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high residue loade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed population and biomass at 30 days after sowing was higher in fields with low residue load (6.96-7.89 t/ha of PR 126) as compared to high residue load (10.25-11.44 t/ha of PR 122)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicago denticulata population and biomass were lower in wheat sown on 15th November.

Treatment
15th November sowne0
Interactor
Medicago denticulatae0weed
Outcome
Population and biomass of Medicago denticulatae0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other broad-leaf weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population and biomass of Medicago denticulata was lower in 15th November sown wheat in contrast to other broad-leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor density was lower in early sown wheat.

Treatment
early sown wheat (25th October)e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
density of Phalaris minore0
Direction
Lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower density of Phalaris minor was recorded under early sown wheat (25th October)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Happy seeder reduced weed density and biomass compared with other residue management methods.

Treatment
happy seedere0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed density and biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other residue management methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed density and biomass was lower under happy seeder as compared to other residue management methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mould board plough plus rotavator left fewer weed seeds in the 0-5 cm soil layer.

Treatment
mould board plough + rotavatore0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed seed per unit areae0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
0-5 cm soil layere0
Comparator
other residue management methodse0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mould board plough + rotavator treatment, weed seed per unit area was lower in 0-5 cm soil layer but it was higher at 10-15 cm soil depth as compared to other residue management methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mould board plough plus rotavator left more weed seeds at 10-15 cm soil depth.

Treatment
mould board plough + rotavatore0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed seed per unit areae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
10-15 cm soil depthe0
Comparator
other residue management methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mould board plough + rotavator treatment, weed seed per unit area was lower in 0-5 cm soil layer but it was higher at 10-15 cm soil depth as compared to other residue management methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue load did not influence wheat plant height, tiller density or biomass.

Treatment
rice residue loade0
Outcome
plant height, tillers density and biomasse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop growth parameters (plant height, tillers density and biomass) were not influenced by rice residue load and wheat planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat planting time did not influence plant height, tiller density or biomass.

Treatment
wheat planting timee0
Outcome
plant height, tillers density and biomasse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop growth parameters (plant height, tillers density and biomass) were not influenced by rice residue load and wheat planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sown wheat had higher grain yield than late sown wheat.

Treatment
early sowne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
late sown wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was recorded highest under early sown wheat as compared to late sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Happy Seeder gave the highest grain yield among residue management systems in the second year.

Treatment
Happy Seedere0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
during second yeare0
Comparator
other residue management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was recorded highest under Happy Seeder as compared to other residue management system during second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was similar across residue management methods in the first year.

Treatment
all residue management methodse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
during first yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was recorded similar under all residue management methods during first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 25th October wheat sowing had fewer grass weeds.

Treatment
25th October sowne0
Interactor
grass weedse0weed
Outcome
grass weedse0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grass weeds were less in 25th October sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1687 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 15th November wheat sowing had fewer broad-leaf weeds.

Treatment
15th November sowne0
Interactor
broad-leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaf weedse0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15th November sown crop has less broad-leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1741 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.