Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as a New Nanoscale Resistance Inducer for Fusarium Wilt Control: Size Effects and Mechanism of Action

Chaopu Ding; Yunfei Zhang; Chongbin Chen; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
15
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In agriculture, soil-borne fungal pathogens, especially Fusarium oxysporum strains, are posing a serious threat to efforts to achieve global food security. In the search for safer agrochemicals, silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) have recently been proposed as a new tool to alleviate pathogen damage including Fusarium wilt. Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles (HMSNs), a unique class of SiO2NPs, have been widely accepted as desirable carriers for pesticides. However, their roles in enhancing disease resistance in plants and the specific mechanism remain unknown. In this study, three sizes of HMSNs (19, 96, and 406 nm as HMSNs-19, HMSNs-96, and HMSNs-406, respectively) were synthesized and characterized to determine their effects on seed germination, seedling growth, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli (FOP) suppression. The three HMSNs exhibited no side effects on cowpea seed germination and seedling growth at concentrations ranging from 100 to 1500 mg/L. The inhibitory effects of the three HMSNs on FOP mycelial growth were very weak, showing inhibition ratios of less than 20% even at 2000 mg/L. Foliar application of HMSNs, however, was demonstrated to reduce the FOP severity in cowpea roots in a size- and concentration-dependent manner. The three HMSNs at a low concentration of 100 mg/L, as well as HMSNs-19 at a high concentration of 1000 mg/L, were observed to have little effect on alleviating the disease incidence. HMSNs-406 were most effective at a concentration of 1000 mg/L, showing an up to 40.00% decline in the disease severity with significant growth-promoting effects on cowpea plants. Moreover, foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L) increased the salicylic acid (SA) content in cowpea roots by 4.3-fold, as well as the expression levels of SA marker genes of PR-1 (by 1.97-fold) and PR-5 (by 9.38-fold), and its receptor gene of NPR-1 (by 1.62-fold), as compared with the FOP infected control plants. Meanwhile, another resistance-related gene of PAL was also upregulated by 8.54-fold. Three defense-responsive enzymes of POD, PAL, and PPO were also involved in the HMSNs-enhanced disease resistance in cowpea roots, with varying degrees of reduction in activity. These results provide substantial evidence that HMSNs exert their Fusarium wilt suppression in cowpea plants by activating SA-dependent SAR (systemic acquired resistance) responses rather than directly suppressing FOP growth. Overall, for the first time, our results indicate a new role of HMSNs as a potent resistance inducer to serve as a low-cost, highly efficient, safe and sustainable alternative for plant disease protection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs had no side effects on cowpea germination and seedling growth at 100–1500 mg/L.

Treatment
three HMSNse0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
no side effectse0
Value
100 to 1500 mg/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three HMSNs exhibited no side effects on cowpea seed germination and seedling growth at concentrations ranging from 100 to 1500 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three HMSNs weakly inhibited FOP mycelial growth, below 20% even at 2000 mg/L.

Treatment
three HMSNse0
Interactor
FOPe0pathogen
Outcome
FOP mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
less than 20%e0
Qualifier
even at 2000 mg/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of the three HMSNs on FOP mycelial growth were very weak, showing inhibition ratios of less than 20% even at 2000 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar HMSNs reduced FOP severity in cowpea roots depending on size and concentration.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Foliar application of HMSNse0
Interactor
FOPe0pathogen
Outcome
FOP severity in cowpea rootse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of HMSNs, however, was demonstrated to reduce the FOP severity in cowpea roots in a size- and concentration-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose HMSNs and high-dose HMSNs-19 had little effect on disease incidence.

Treatment
three HMSNs at a low concentration of 100 mg/Le0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogent0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three HMSNs at a low concentration of 100 mg/L, as well as HMSNs-19 at a high concentration of 1000 mg/L, were observed to have little effect on alleviating the disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e2

“HMSNs exert their Fusarium wilt suppression in cowpea plants by activating SA-dependent SAR (systemic acquired resistance) responses rather than directly suppressing FOP growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 at 1000 mg/L reduced disease severity by up to 40.00%.

Treatment
HMSNs-406e0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogent0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
declinee0
Value
up to 40.00%e0
Qualifier
at a concentration of 1000 mg/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HMSNs-406 were most effective at a concentration of 1000 mg/L, showing an up to 40.00% decline in the disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e2

“HMSNs exert their Fusarium wilt suppression in cowpea plants by activating SA-dependent SAR (systemic acquired resistance) responses rather than directly suppressing FOP growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 promoted cowpea plant growth.

Treatment
HMSNs-406t0
Outcome
growth-promoting effectse0
Direction
growth-promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with significant growth-promoting effects on cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“HMSNs-406 were most effective at a concentration of 1000 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 increased root SA content 4.3-fold against infected controls.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)e0
Outcome
salicylic acid (SA) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.3-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L) increased the salicylic acid (SA) content in cowpea roots by 4.3-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 increased PR-1 expression 1.97-fold.

Treatment
HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)e1
Gene
PR-1e0
Outcome
expression levelse0
Value
1.97-folde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression levels of SA marker genes of PR-1 (by 1.97-fold) and PR-5 (by 9.38-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1845 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 increased PR-5 expression 9.38-fold.

Treatment
HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)e1
Gene
PR-5e0
Outcome
expression levelse0
Value
9.38-folde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression levels of SA marker genes of PR-1 (by 1.97-fold) and PR-5 (by 9.38-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1845 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HMSNs-406 increased NPR-1 expression 1.62-fold.

Treatment
HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)e1
Gene
NPR-1e0
Outcome
receptor genee0
Value
1.62-folde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its receptor gene of NPR-1 (by 1.62-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL was upregulated 8.54-fold.

Treatment
HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)e1
Gene
PALe0
Outcome
resistance-related genee0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
8.54-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“another resistance-related gene of PAL was also upregulated by 8.54-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2027 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of HMSNs-406 (1000 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD, PAL and PPO enzyme activities were reduced to varying degrees.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
HMSNse0
Gene
POD, PAL, and PPOe0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three defense-responsive enzymes of POD, PAL, and PPO were also involved in the HMSNs-enhanced disease resistance in cowpea roots, with varying degrees of reduction in activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2205 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed wilt suppression to SA-dependent systemic acquired resistance.

Treatment
HMSNse0
Interactor
FOPe0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium wilt suppressione0
Qualifier
activating SA-dependent SAR (systemic acquired resistance) responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HMSNs exert their Fusarium wilt suppression in cowpea plants by activating SA-dependent SAR (systemic acquired resistance) responses rather than directly suppressing FOP growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2431 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.