Paper · 2024 · Journal of Cleaner Production

Applications of chitosan alone, alternated or combined with copper for grapevine downy mildew management in large scale trials

Gianfranco Romanazzi; Simone Piancatelli; Roberto Potentini; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The persistent use of copper-based fungicides to control grapevine downy mildew (GDM) still represents risks to both human health and the environment, especially in organic production. This heavy metal can affect wine quality due to residues’ presence on grape bunches. Implementing sustainable viticultural practices to control diseases is crucial for the wine industry. This work aimed to evaluate chitosan effectiveness toward GDM on a large scale, over a period of three years (2019–2021), and in three distinct vineyards with different environmental conditions. Three GDM management strategies were tested: application of 0.5% chitosan individually; in alternation with copper; and during the last year, in combination with low rate of copper, using conventional strategies and untreated plants as controls. Over three consecutive seasons, chitosan treatments effectively reduced GDM McKinney Index on leaves and bunches under different environmental conditions. On bunches, chitosan alone was less effective than copper, when applied after copper had the same effectiveness, and combined with copper was more effective than copper standard. In 2020 and 2021, the analysis of cooper amount detected in berries of two cultivars showed that all strategies allowed to decrease the amount of copper residue in berries. The application of chitosan alone or in alternation with copper was able to reduce this amount as untreated control. This large scale investigation suggests chitosan as alternative that can integrate and eventually replace copper application against GDM. Further studies to validate these strategies in different environments, disease pressure conditions and cultivar are fundamental towards achieving green and sustainable solutions for GDM management strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatments reduced downy mildew McKinney Index on grapevine leaves and bunches.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
leaves and bunchese0
Treatment
chitosan treatmentse0
Outcome
GDM McKinney Index on leaves and bunchese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over three consecutive seasons, chitosan treatments effectively reduced GDM McKinney Index on leaves and bunches under different environmental conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“using conventional strategies and untreated plants as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan alone was less effective than copper on bunches.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
bunchese0
Treatment
chitosan alonee0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
coppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On bunches, chitosan alone was less effective than copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan applied after copper had the same effectiveness as copper on bunches.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
bunchese1
Treatment
applied after coppere0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
coppere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when applied after copper had the same effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“On bunches, chitosan alone was less effective than copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan combined with copper was more effective than standard copper on bunches.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
bunchese1
Treatment
combined with coppere0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
copper standarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined with copper was more effective than copper standard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“On bunches, chitosan alone was less effective than copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested strategies decreased copper residue in berries in 2020 and 2021.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
berriese0
Treatment
all strategiese0
Outcome
amount of copper residue in berriese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
conventional strategiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the analysis of cooper amount detected in berries of two cultivars showed that all strategies allowed to decrease the amount of copper residue in berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“using conventional strategies and untreated plants as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan alone reduced berry copper residue to the untreated control level.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
chitosan alonee0
Outcome
amount of copper residue in berriese1
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chitosan alone or in alternation with copper was able to reduce this amount as untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“amount of copper residue in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan alternated with copper reduced berry copper residue to the untreated control level.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
in alternation with coppere0
Outcome
amount of copper residue in berriese1
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chitosan alone or in alternation with copper was able to reduce this amount as untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“amount of copper residue in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest chitosan could integrate with or eventually replace copper against grapevine downy mildew.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
chitosan as alternative that can integrate and eventually replace copper application against GDMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This large scale investigation suggests chitosan as alternative that can integrate and eventually replace copper application against GDM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · nutrient: content · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · disease · VitisResults agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.