Paper · 2024 · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies

Optimizing Seed Rate and Herbicide DosesWith or Without Adjuvant for Weed Controland Its Influence on Yield of Winter Wheat

Mujahid Hussain; Nadia Rafique; Rehana Kaousar; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the interactive effect of seed rates and herbicides in combination with adjuvants on weed dynamics and wheat yield. This study was comprised of 3 seed rates; 100 kg h-1 (S1), 130 kg h-1 (S2), 160 kg h-1 (S3), and 3 herbicide dosages (100% recommended dose of Mesosulfuron-methyl + Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium (H1), 75% of the dose (H2), and 75% dose + adjuvant (H3). The results revealed that average weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were lower in seed rate 160 kg h-1 by 33.37%, 31.52%, and 28.78% compared to 100 kg h-1 before herbicide application, respectively. After 30 days of herbicide application, weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were 42.16%, 34.74%, and 40.91% less in treatment with the combination of S3H3 compared with S1H2. Yield and yield parameters were significantly affected by the different seed rates and herbicide dosages. 1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spike were greater in the lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3, while the grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were 26.05%, 21.81%, and 5.39% higher in the treatment S3H3 as compared with S1H2. To achieve optimal grain yield, a seed rate of 160 kg h-1 is recommended, along with 75% of the recommended herbicide dose with adjuvant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 160 kg h-1, weed density was 33.37% lower than at 100 kg h-1 before herbicide application.

Treatment
160 kg h-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
33.37%e0
Comparator
100 kg h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that average weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were lower in seed rate 160 kg h-1 by 33.37%, 31.52%, and 28.78% compared to 100 kg h-1 before herbicide application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 160 kg h-1, weed fresh weight was 31.52% lower.

Treatment
160 kg h-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, fresh weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
31.52%e0
Comparator
100 kg h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that average weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were lower in seed rate 160 kg h-1 by 33.37%, 31.52%, and 28.78% compared to 100 kg h-1 before herbicide application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 160 kg h-1, weed dry weight was 28.78% lower.

Treatment
160 kg h-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, fresh weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
28.78%e0
Comparator
100 kg h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that average weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were lower in seed rate 160 kg h-1 by 33.37%, 31.52%, and 28.78% compared to 100 kg h-1 before herbicide application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 reduced weed density by 42.16% versus S1H2 after 30 days.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
42.16%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 30 days of herbicide application, weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were 42.16%, 34.74%, and 40.91% less in treatment with the combination of S3H3 compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 reduced weed fresh weight by 34.74% versus S1H2 after 30 days.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, fresh weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
34.74%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 30 days of herbicide application, weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were 42.16%, 34.74%, and 40.91% less in treatment with the combination of S3H3 compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 reduced weed dry weight by 40.91% versus S1H2 after 30 days.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, fresh weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
40.91%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 30 days of herbicide application, weed density, fresh weight, and dry weight were 42.16%, 34.74%, and 40.91% less in treatment with the combination of S3H3 compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rates and herbicide doses significantly affected yield and yield parameters.

Treatment
different seed rates and herbicide dosagese0
Outcome
Yield and yield parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and yield parameters were significantly affected by the different seed rates and herbicide dosages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the lower seed rate with H3, 1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains per spike were greater.

Treatment
lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3e0
Outcome
1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spikee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spike were greater in the lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3, while the grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were 26.05%, 21.81%, and 5.39% higher in the treatment S3H3 as compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 raised grain yield by 26.05% compared with S1H2.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.05%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spike were greater in the lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3, while the grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were 26.05%, 21.81%, and 5.39% higher in the treatment S3H3 as compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 raised biological yield by 21.81% compared with S1H2.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.81%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spike were greater in the lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3, while the grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were 26.05%, 21.81%, and 5.39% higher in the treatment S3H3 as compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3H3 raised harvest index by 5.39% compared with S1H2.

Treatment
S3H3e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.39%e0
Comparator
S1H2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight, spikelets, and grains/spike were greater in the lower seed rate (100 kg h-1) with H3, while the grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were 26.05%, 21.81%, and 5.39% higher in the treatment S3H3 as compared with S1H2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 160 kg h-1 seed rate with 75% herbicide dose and adjuvant for grain yield.

Treatment
75% of the recommended herbicide dose with adjuvante0
Outcome
a seed rate of 160 kg h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To achieve optimal grain yield, a seed rate of 160 kg h-1 is recommended, along with 75% of the recommended herbicide dose with adjuvant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.