Paper · 2022 · Jurnal Agrium

Growth Effects of Corn Plants (Zea mays) on Agronomic Aspects of Oil Palm Tree Stands

Ansoruddin Ansoruddin; Deddy Wahyudin Purba; Winda Lestari Butar-Butar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the agronomic study of the tolerance of corn plants to conditions shaded by oil palm trees. This research was conducted from July to October 2022. At the Oil Palm Plantation of the Community of Bunut Seberang Village, Asahan Regency, North Sumatra. This study used a factorial randomized block design with two factors and three replications. The first treatment consisted of a shading level (P) with 4 treatment levels namely (P0) without shading, (P1) 35% shading, (P2) 70% shading. The second treatment consisted of a variety of corn (J) with 6 varieties, namely Exsotic Pertiwi (V1), Paragon (V2), Bonanza F1 (V3), Bisi 2 (V4) varieties. The best plant height parameter in the shade level treatment showed 35% shade (P1) resulted in the highest plant height of 113.98 cm, while in the Variety (V4) Bisi-2 variety treatment showed the highest plant, namely 112.83 when compared to other varieties. The effect of various varieties on leaf area showed a significant effect at the age of 6 and 8 WAP. The degree of shade and differences in varieties show the similarity in the quality of the green leaves. The level of shade showed a significant effect on chlorophyll-a and total chlorophyll-a and b where the highest amount of chlorophyll-a was found in the treatment without shade, which was not significantly different from the level of 70% shade, while varieties had a significant effect in producing net photosynthesis formed

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 35% shade, corn plant height was highest at 113.98 cm.

Taxon
corn plantsZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
35% shade (P1)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
113.98 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“35% shade (P1) resulted in the highest plant height of 113.98 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bisi-2 had the highest plant height among varieties, reported as 112.83.

Material
Bisi-2e0
Treatment
(V4) Bisi-2 variety treatmente0
Outcome
plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
112.83e0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(V4) Bisi-2 variety treatment showed the highest plant, namely 112.83 when compared to other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn varieties differed significantly in leaf area at 6 and 8 WAP.

Treatment
various varietiese0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Qualifier
at the age of 6 and 8 WAPe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various varieties on leaf area showed a significant effect at the age of 6 and 8 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade levels and varieties produced similar green leaf quality.

Treatment
degree of shadee0
Outcome
quality of the green leavese0
Direction
similaritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“degree of shade and differences in varieties show the similarity in the quality of the green leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade significantly affected chlorophyll-a, with the highest amount without shade and no significant difference from 70% shade.

Treatment
treatment without shadee0
Outcome
chlorophyll-ae0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
not significantly differente0
Comparator
level of 70% shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“level of shade showed a significant effect on chlorophyll-a and total chlorophyll-a and b where the highest amount of chlorophyll-a was found in the treatment without shade, which was not significantly different from the level of 70% shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade significantly affected total chlorophyll-a and b.

Treatment
level of shadee0
Outcome
total chlorophyll-a and be0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“level of shade showed a significant effect on chlorophyll-a and total chlorophyll-a and b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn varieties significantly affected net photosynthesis.

Treatment
varietiese0
Outcome
net photosynthesise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties had a significant effect in producing net photosynthesis formed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

46 papers: 2 positive, 44 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

shade · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.