Paper · 2023 · 2023 5th International Conference on Frontiers Technology of Information and Computer (ICFTIC)

Improved Lightweight Apple Object Detection Method Based on YOLOv5s

Yunfei Jia; Chang Liu

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fast and accurate object detection is an important and challenging task in the context of automated apple harvesting. However, the current object detection models have relatively large network parameters. In this work, improvements have been made to the object detection algorithm based on YOLOv5s, by replacing the original model’s backbone network with the ShuffleNetV2 lightweight network structure. To compensate for the reduction in model parameters, this paper introduces the ECA mechanism and SPPF module after the ShuffleNetV2 modules to improve the model’s accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved lightweight YOLOv5s network reduces the parameter count by 85.6%, decreases computational load by 87.3%, and achieves a detection accuracy mAP@0.5 of 97.0% for apple detection, which is 0.4% higher than the original YOLOv5s model. The detection frame rate has also improved by 15 FPS compared to the original model, making it suitable for practical apple detection in real-world environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved detector reduced parameter count by 85.6%.

Outcome
parameter counte0
Direction
reducese0
Value
85.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved lightweight YOLOv5s network reduces the parameter count by 85.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved detector reduced computational load by 87.3%.

Outcome
computational loade0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
87.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved lightweight YOLOv5s network reduces the parameter count by 85.6%, decreases computational load by 87.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple detection accuracy reached mAP@0.5 of 97.0%.

Outcome
detection accuracy mAP@0.5e0
Value
97.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“achieves a detection accuracy mAP@0.5 of 97.0% for apple detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–802 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detection accuracy was 0.4% higher than the original YOLOv5s.

Outcome
apple detectione0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.4%e0
Comparator
original YOLOv5s modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple detection, which is 0.4% higher than the original YOLOv5s model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–856 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detection frame rate improved by 15 FPS relative to the original model.

Outcome
detection frame ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
15 FPSe0
Comparator
original modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The detection frame rate has also improved by 15 FPS compared to the original model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑