Paper · 2023 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

The Efficacy of Fungicides Against Cercospora beticola in Field Conditions

Kamil Hudec; Milan Mihók; Tibor Roháčik

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract This study is focused on the evaluation of the efficacy of conventional fungicides against Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet. The results showed that the best protection against CLS was achieved by treatment with kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (T1) and tetraconazole (T2). The second highest fungicide efficacy was detected after treatment with (kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole -T1) + difenoconazole -T2, followed by (azoxystrobin + cyproconazole) + difenoconazole, (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole, Urtica dioica plant extracts + Salix spp. plant extracts, (trifloxystrobin + cyproconazole) + tetraconazole, and picoxystrobin + tetraconazole. The positive effect of fungicide protection on yield and sugar content was higher in the year with a higher occurrence of CLS. Good CLS management could increase the root yield by up to 19.34%, and sugar yield by up to 23.83% in comparison to the untreated check. The highest sugar yield was achieved in the treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole, followed by (kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole) + difenoconazole, (azoxystrobin + cyproconazole) + difenoconazole, (trifloxystrobin + cyproconazole) + tetraconazole, picoxystrobin + tetraconazole, and Urtica dioica plant extracts + Salix spp. plant extracts. The results showed a strong relationship of root yield and sugar yield on fungicide treatment during the vegetation. The occurrence of fungicide resistance in Cercospora beticola population has an important impact on efficacy of applied fungicides in field conditions. The highest economic effectiveness coefficient was achieved at treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kresoxim-methyl plus epoxiconazole (T1) gave the best protection against Cercospora leaf spot.

Treatment
kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (T1)e1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
protection against CLSe1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the best protection against CLS was achieved by treatment with kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (T1) and tetraconazole (T2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraconazole (T2) gave the best protection against Cercospora leaf spot.

Treatment
tetraconazole (T2)e1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
protection against CLSe1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the best protection against CLS was achieved by treatment with kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (T1) and tetraconazole (T2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The kresoxim-methyl plus epoxiconazole followed by difenoconazole treatment had the second highest fungicide efficacy.

Treatment
(kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole -T1) + difenoconazole -T2e1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
fungicide efficacye1
Direction
second higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The second highest fungicide efficacy was detected after treatment with (kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole -T1) + difenoconazole -T2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–420 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide protection had a greater positive effect on yield and sugar content in the year with more Cercospora leaf spot.

Treatment
fungicide protectione1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
yield and sugar contente1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
higher occurrence of CLSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The positive effect of fungicide protection on yield and sugar content was higher in the year with a higher occurrence of CLS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good Cercospora leaf spot management increased sugar-beet root yield by up to 19.34% against untreated plants.

Treatment
Good CLS managemente1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
root yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
19.34%e1
Comparator
untreated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Good CLS management could increase the root yield by up to 19.34%, and sugar yield by up to 23.83% in comparison to the untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good Cercospora leaf spot management increased sugar yield by up to 23.83% against untreated plants.

Treatment
Good CLS managemente1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
23.83%e1
Comparator
untreated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Good CLS management could increase the root yield by up to 19.34%, and sugar yield by up to 23.83% in comparison to the untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The prochloraz plus propiconazole followed by tetraconazole treatment gave the highest sugar yield.

Treatment
(prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazolee1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest sugar yield was achieved in the treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root yield and sugar yield were strongly related to fungicide treatment.

Treatment
fungicide treatmente1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
root yield and sugar yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed a strong relationship of root yield and sugar yield on fungicide treatment during the vegetation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1413 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide resistance in Cercospora beticola affected fungicide efficacy in the field.

Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolae1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy of applied fungicidese1
Qualifier
fungicide resistancee1
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The occurrence of fungicide resistance in Cercospora beticola population has an important impact on efficacy of applied fungicides in field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The prochloraz plus propiconazole followed by tetraconazole treatment had the highest economic effectiveness coefficient.

Treatment
(prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazolee1
Interactor
CercosporaCercosporae0pathogen
Outcome
economic effectiveness coefficiente1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora
Cercospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest economic effectiveness coefficient was achieved at treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1687 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · Cercospora · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.