Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Influence of Edible Potato Production Technologies with the Use of Soil Conditioner on the Nutritional Value of Tubers

Katarzyna Gościnna; Katarzyna Retmańska; Elżbieta Wszelaczyńska; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the application of different organic matter, UGmax soil conditioner and simplifications in potato cultivation on the content of dry matter, starch and sugars in tubers of the medium-early edible cultivar ‘Satina’ after harvest and after long-term storage. The highest dry matter (173.4 g kg−1) and starch (124.6 g kg−1 f. m.) content was obtained with the simultaneous application of a manure with soil conditioner at 100% mineral fertilization. In the case of sugars, the withdrawal of the soil conditioner from the crop proved most beneficial, for total sugars on the stubble intercrop (5.06 g kg−1 f. m.) and for reducing sugars (1.99 g kg−1 f. m.) in the case of straw treatment. Each protection reduction applied resulted in a significant reduction in starch content. In this regard, the withdrawal of herbicides with the simultaneous application of manure and UGmax proved most beneficial. Long-term storage of tubers caused a significant reduction in their quality in terms of dry matter and starch content (average by −3.6 and −2.3%, respectively) and an increase in total and reducing sugars (average by 11.8 and 9.6%, respectively). The decrease in dry matter and starch content was significantly influenced by the 50% reduction in NPK fertilization applied during the growing season, while the application of soil conditioner with full protection contributed to the increase in reducing sugars after storage at 28.9 pts%. Our research is in line with current trends of used potato cultivation technologies focused mainly on environmental protection, so the results of this study can provide a basis for validation for researchers currently engaged in such evaluation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with soil conditioner at full mineral fertilization produced the highest tuber dry matter content, 173.4 g kg−1.

Treatment
simultaneous application of a manure with soil conditioner at 100% mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
173.4 g kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest dry matter (173.4 g kg−1) and starch (124.6 g kg−1 f. m.) content was obtained with the simultaneous application of a manure with soil conditioner at 100% mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with soil conditioner at full mineral fertilization produced the highest tuber starch content, 124.6 g kg−1 f. m.

Treatment
simultaneous application of a manure with soil conditioner at 100% mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
higheste0
Value
124.6 g kg−1 f. m.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest dry matter (173.4 g kg−1) and starch (124.6 g kg−1 f. m.) content was obtained with the simultaneous application of a manure with soil conditioner at 100% mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding soil conditioner on the stubble intercrop was most beneficial for total sugars, measured at 5.06 g kg−1 f. m.

Treatment
withdrawal of the soil conditionere0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
most beneficiale0
Value
5.06 g kg−1 f. m.e0
Qualifier
on the stubble intercrope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the withdrawal of the soil conditioner from the crop proved most beneficial, for total sugars on the stubble intercrop (5.06 g kg−1 f. m.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding soil conditioner with straw treatment was most beneficial for reducing sugars, measured at 1.99 g kg−1 f. m.

Treatment
withdrawal of the soil conditionere0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
most beneficiale0
Value
1.99 g kg−1 f. m.e0
Qualifier
straw treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the withdrawal of the soil conditioner from the crop proved most beneficial, for total sugars on the stubble intercrop (5.06 g kg−1 f. m.) and for reducing sugars (1.99 g kg−1 f. m.) in the case of straw treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Every reduction in protection significantly reduced tuber starch content.

Treatment
protection reductione0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each protection reduction applied resulted in a significant reduction in starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withdrawal of herbicides with manure and UGmax was most beneficial for starch content.

Treatment
withdrawal of herbicides with the simultaneous application of manure and UGmaxe0
Outcome
starch contente1
Direction
most beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this regard, the withdrawal of herbicides with the simultaneous application of manure and UGmax proved most beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–947 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant reduction in starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term tuber storage significantly reduced dry matter content by an average of −3.6%.

Treatment
Long-term storagee0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
−3.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage of tubers caused a significant reduction in their quality in terms of dry matter and starch content (average by −3.6 and −2.3%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term tuber storage significantly reduced starch content by an average of −2.3%.

Treatment
Long-term storagee0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
−2.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage of tubers caused a significant reduction in their quality in terms of dry matter and starch content (average by −3.6 and −2.3%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term storage increased total sugars by an average of 11.8%.

Treatment
Long-term storagee0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage of tubers caused a significant reduction in their quality in terms of dry matter and starch content (average by −3.6 and −2.3%, respectively) and an increase in total and reducing sugars (average by 11.8 and 9.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term storage increased reducing sugars by an average of 9.6%.

Treatment
Long-term storagee0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage of tubers caused a significant reduction in their quality in terms of dry matter and starch content (average by −3.6 and −2.3%, respectively) and an increase in total and reducing sugars (average by 11.8 and 9.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% reduction in NPK fertilization during the growing season significantly influenced the storage-related decrease in tuber dry matter and starch content.

Treatment
50% reduction in NPK fertilizatione0
Outcome
dry matter and starch contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in dry matter and starch content was significantly influenced by the 50% reduction in NPK fertilization applied during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil conditioner with full protection increased reducing sugars after storage by 28.9 pts%.

Treatment
application of soil conditioner with full protectione0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.9 pts%e0
Qualifier
after storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of soil conditioner with full protection contributed to the increase in reducing sugars after storage at 28.9 pts%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 122 positive, 18 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.