Paper · 2024 · Environment and Ecology

Effect of Organic Manure and Bio-Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)

Ritika .; Puja Rattan

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during 2022 at DAV University, Jalandhar, to find out the effect of organic manure and bio-fertilizer on growth and yield of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). The experiment consisted of twelve treatments viz. T1 (FYM @ 20 t/ha), T2 (vermicompost @ 5 t/ha), T3 (Neem cake @ 2.5 t/ha), T4 (Azotobacter @ 4 kg/ha), T5 (Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + FYM @ 10 t/ha), T6 (Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @2.5 t/ha), T7 (Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + neem cake @1.25 t/ha), T8 (PSB @ 4 kg/ha), T9 (PSB @ 4 kg/ha + FYM @ 20 t/ha), T10 (PSB @ 4 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha), T11 (PSB @ 4 kg/ha + Neem cake @ 2.5 t/ha), T12 (Control : RDF 60:125:25 kg NPK) and one variety (Green ball) and laid in RBD with three replications. Observations were recorded on growth parameters like plant height, number of days to male flower appearance, number of days to female flower appearance, number of days to fruit set, number of days to fruit harvest, sex ratio, number of branches, number of fruits per plant per picking, average fruit weight (g), yield parameter like marketable yield (q/ha) and quality parameter like TSS. It was observed that plants which were treated with (T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha resulted better in most of the growth, yield and quality parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter plus vermicompost performed better on most growth parameters.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
(T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that plants which were treated with (T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha resulted better in most of the growth, yield and quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter plus vermicompost performed better on most yield parameters.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
(T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that plants which were treated with (T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha resulted better in most of the growth, yield and quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter plus vermicompost performed better on most quality parameters.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
(T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that plants which were treated with (T6) Azotobacter @ 2 kg/ha + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha resulted better in most of the growth, yield and quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer squash”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 42 positive, 9 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.