Paper · 2024 · HortScience

Grafted Tomatoes Removed More Soil Phosphorus than Nongrafted Tomatoes under High-phosphorus Conditions

Charlie L. Rohwer

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nonpoint-source phosphorus (P) from agricultural fields is a contaminant of surface waters, and high soil P fertility exacerbates this problem. Many vegetable growers and gardeners have a history of applying more P than is necessary for optimum plant growth. Avoiding unnecessary P applications is an important part of the long-term solution to reducing P loading in water. When soil P levels are very high, management practices that result in more intense P removal are recommended to reduce these levels and the potential for aquatic ecosystem contamination with P. Growers may apply soluble starter fertilizer containing P to encourage rapid transplant establishment; however, the effectiveness of this practice is unknown for soil P levels considered high or very high. Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks may help the plant remove more P from the soil than nongrafted plants. This study investigated the effects of organic starter P fertilizers applied to three hybrids of nongrafted tomato and the same hybrids grafted onto ‘Estamino’ rootstock in field-grown conditions during three site-years with high preplant P fertility. The yield, fruit P concentration, and amount of P removed from the field were measured to elucidate starter P and grafting impacts on P removal. Starter P was not impactful on all responses. Grafting increased the total yield by 11.6%, fruit P concentration in a genotype-dependent manner (average of 12.6%), and net P removal from the field by 28.4% (6.0 kg P/ha). Net P removal was positively correlated with the total yield ( r = 0.821) and fruit P concentration ( r = 0.502), suggesting that practices to increase the yield or P concentration independently increase net P removal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased the total yield of tomato by 11.6% compared with nongrafted tomato.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Estaminoe7
Treatment
Graftinge2
Outcome
total yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
11.6%e2
Comparator
nongrafted tomatoe7
Setting
field-grown conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown conditions during three site-years with high preplant P fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grafting increased the total yield by 11.6%, fruit P concentration in a genotype-dependent manner (average of 12.6%), and net P removal from the field by 28.4% (6.0 kg P/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“organic starter P fertilizers applied to three hybrids of nongrafted tomato and the same hybrids grafted onto ‘Estamino’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit P concentration of tomato, in a genotype-dependent manner, by an average of 12.6%.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Graftinge2
Outcome
fruit P concentratione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
average of 12.6%e2
Qualifier
genotype-dependent mannere2
Comparator
nongrafted tomatoe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grafting increased the total yield by 11.6%, fruit P concentration in a genotype-dependent manner (average of 12.6%), and net P removal from the field by 28.4% (6.0 kg P/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“organic starter P fertilizers applied to three hybrids of nongrafted tomato and the same hybrids grafted onto ‘Estamino’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased net P removal from the field by 28.4% (6.0 kg P/ha).

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Graftinge2
Outcome
net P removal from the fielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
28.4%e2
Qualifier
6.0 kg P/hae2
Comparator
nongrafted tomatoe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grafting increased the total yield by 11.6%, fruit P concentration in a genotype-dependent manner (average of 12.6%), and net P removal from the field by 28.4% (6.0 kg P/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“organic starter P fertilizers applied to three hybrids of nongrafted tomato and the same hybrids grafted onto ‘Estamino’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic starter P fertilizer had no detectable impact on the measured responses.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
organic starter P fertilizerse7
Outcome
all responsese3
Direction
not impactfule3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e3

“Starter P was not impactful on all responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1356 · show in text ↑
e7

“organic starter P fertilizers applied to three hybrids of nongrafted tomato and the same hybrids grafted onto ‘Estamino’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1084 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net P removal was positively correlated with total yield (r = 0.821).

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Outcome
Net P removale4
Direction
positively correlatede4
Value
r = 0.821e4
Setting
field-grown conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown conditions during three site-years with high preplant P fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“Net P removal was positively correlated with the total yield ( r = 0.821)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1606 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net P removal was positively correlated with fruit P concentration (r = 0.502).

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Outcome
Net P removale4
Direction
positively correlatede4
Value
r = 0.502e5
Qualifier
fruit P concentratione5
Setting
field-grown conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“field-grown conditions during three site-years with high preplant P fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“Net P removal was positively correlated with the total yield ( r = 0.821)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1606 · show in text ↑
e5

“fruit P concentration ( r = 0.502)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1645 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Practices that raise yield or fruit P concentration may independently increase net P removal.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
practices to increase the yield or P concentratione6
Outcome
net P removale6
Direction
increasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto vigorous rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
e6

“practices to increase the yield or P concentration independently increase net P removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1750 · show in text ↑

grafting · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.