Abstract
The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis which can reduce productivity. The aim of this research was to assess the resistance of mung bean genotypes against M. testulalis. Three replicates of the experiment were run using a randomized block design in the ILETRI screen house. 27 different genotypes in all were treated. The planting dates were planned to coincide with the genotypes’ flowering dates. Each plant received a two-day infestation of a pair of adult M. testulalis on the flowering date. The outcome demonstrated that seed weight and seed damage intensity were strongly impacted by genotype differences. Damage levels for the pod and seed were, respectively, 2.9-38.5% and 0.7-13.9%. The lowest was found on MMC 672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42 and the highest was found on Vima 1. Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis. This resistance was non-preference for oviposit and feeding. These four genotypes could be used as gen source for resistant to M. testulalis in the next mung bean breeding program as well as considered to be released as resistant varieties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Seed weight and seed damage intensity were strongly affected by genotype differences in mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- genotypee1
- Interactor
- Maruca testulalis
Maruca testulalise0pest - Outcome
- seed weight and seed damage intensitye1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e1“seed weight and seed damage intensity were strongly impacted by genotype differences”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod damage by Maruca testulalis in mung bean ranged from 2.9% to 38.5%.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Interactor
- Maruca testulalis
Maruca testulalise0pest - Outcome
- Damage levels for the pode2
- Value
- 2.9-38.5%e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e2“Damage levels for the pod and seed were, respectively, 2.9-38.5% and 0.7-13.9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed damage in mung bean ranged from 0.7% to 13.9%.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Interactor
- Maruca testulalis
Maruca testulalise0pest - Outcome
- Damage levels for the pod and seede2
- Value
- 0.7-13.9%e2
- Qualifier
- respectivelye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e2“Damage levels for the pod and seed were, respectively, 2.9-38.5% and 0.7-13.9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Damage levels were lowest on the genotype MMC 672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42 in mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- MMC 672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42e3
- Interactor
- Maruca testulalis
Maruca testulalise0pest - Outcome
- Damage levelse2
- Direction
- loweste3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e3“The lowest was found on MMC 672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42 and the highest was found on Vima 1”
e2“Damage levels for the pod and seed were, respectively, 2.9-38.5% and 0.7-13.9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Damage levels were highest on the genotype Vima 1 in mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- Vima 1e3
- Interactor
- Maruca testulalis
Maruca testulalise0pest - Outcome
- Damage levelse2
- Direction
- higheste3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e3“The lowest was found on MMC 672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42 and the highest was found on Vima 1”
e2“Damage levels for the pod and seed were, respectively, 2.9-38.5% and 0.7-13.9%”
Claim · model-written summary
The mung bean genotype MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2 is categorized as resistant to Maruca testulalis.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2e4
- Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise4pest - Outcome
- categorized as resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e4“Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis”
Claim · model-written summary
The mung bean genotype MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4 is categorized as resistant to Maruca testulalis.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4e4
- Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise4pest - Outcome
- categorized as resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e4“Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis”
Claim · model-written summary
The mung bean genotype MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42 is categorized as resistant to Maruca testulalis.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42e4
- Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise4pest - Outcome
- categorized as resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e4“Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis”
Claim · model-written summary
The mung bean genotype MLG 1065/Vima 2-50 is categorized as resistant to Maruca testulalis.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- MLG 1065/Vima 2-50e4
- Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise4pest - Outcome
- categorized as resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e4“Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis”
Claim · model-written summary
The mung bean genotype Nuri is categorized as resistant to Maruca testulalis.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- Nurie4
- Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise4pest - Outcome
- categorized as resistante4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e4“Based on the choice method, there were found five genotypes (MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-2, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Sampeong-4, MMC672-3c-Gt-1/Vima 2-42, MLG 1065/Vima 2-50, and Nuri) categorized as resistant against M. testulalis”
Claim · model-written summary
The resistance of these mung bean genotypes is due to non-preference for oviposition and feeding.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- resistancee5
- Qualifier
- non-preference for oviposit and feedinge5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e5“This resistance was non-preference for oviposit and feeding”
Claim · model-written summary
The four resistant genotypes could be used as a gene source for resistance to Maruca testulalis in the next mung bean breeding program.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Interactor
- M. testulalis
Maruca testulalise6pest - Outcome
- gen sourcee6
- Qualifier
- in the next mung bean breeding programe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e6“These four genotypes could be used as gen source for resistant to M. testulalis in the next mung bean breeding program as well as considered to be released as resistant varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
The four resistant genotypes could be considered for release as resistant mung bean varieties.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Outcome
- released as resistant varietiese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The one problem faced in mung bean cultivation is the attack of Maruca testulalis”
e6“These four genotypes could be used as gen source for resistant to M. testulalis in the next mung bean breeding program as well as considered to be released as resistant varieties”