Paper · 2024 · Global Change Biology

A global meta‐analysis of yield‐scaled N2O emissions and its mitigation efforts for maize, wheat, and rice

Zhisheng Yao; Haojie Guo; Yan Wang; et al.

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
73
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Maintaining or even increasing crop yields while reducing nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions is necessary to reconcile food security and climate change, while the metric of yield‐scaled N 2 O emission (i.e., N 2 O emissions per unit of crop yield) is at present poorly understood. Here we conducted a global meta‐analysis with more than 6000 observations to explore the variation patterns and controlling factors of yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions for maize, wheat and rice and associated potential mitigation options. Our results showed that the average yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg −1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301–346) > maize (211 g N Mg −1 , CI: 198–225) > rice (153 g N Mg −1 , CI: 144–163). Yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions for individual crops were generally higher in tropical or subtropical zones than in temperate zones, and also showed a trend towards lower intensities from low to high latitudes. This global variation was better explained by climatic and edaphic factors than by N fertilizer management, while their combined effect predicted more than 70% of the variance. Furthermore, our analysis showed a significant decrease in yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions with increasing N use efficiency or in N 2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha −1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha −1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha −1 (rice), respectively. This highlights that N use efficiency indicators can be used as valuable proxies for reconciling trade‐offs between crop production and N 2 O mitigation. For all three major staple crops, reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced‐efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields. Our data‐driven assessment provides some key guidance for developing effective and targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies for the sustainable intensification of cereal production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat had average yield-scaled N2O emissions of 322 g N Mg −1.

Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
>e0
Value
322 g N Mg −1e0
Qualifier
301–346e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg −1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301–346) > maize (211 g N Mg −1 , CI: 198–225) > rice (153 g N Mg −1 , CI: 144–163)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize had average yield-scaled N2O emissions of 211 g N Mg −1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
>e0
Value
211 g N Mg −1e0
Qualifier
198–225e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg −1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301–346) > maize (211 g N Mg −1 , CI: 198–225) > rice (153 g N Mg −1 , CI: 144–163)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice had average yield-scaled N2O emissions of 153 g N Mg −1.

Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
153 g N Mg −1e0
Qualifier
144–163e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg −1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301–346) > maize (211 g N Mg −1 , CI: 198–225) > rice (153 g N Mg −1 , CI: 144–163)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–777 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-scaled emissions were generally higher in tropical or subtropical zones than temperate zones.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
Yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
temperate zonese0
Setting
tropical or subtropical zonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions for individual crops were generally higher in tropical or subtropical zones than in temperate zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-scaled emissions trended lower from low to high latitudes.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
intensitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
low to high latitudese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed a trend towards lower intensities from low to high latitudes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climatic and edaphic factors explained global variation better than N fertilizer management.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
global variatione0
Comparator
N fertilizer managemente0
Setting
climatic and edaphic factorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This global variation was better explained by climatic and edaphic factors than by N fertilizer management, while their combined effect predicted more than 70% of the variance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined climatic, edaphic and management factors predicted more than 70% of variance.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
variancee0
Value
more than 70%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their combined effect predicted more than 70% of the variance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen use efficiency was associated with significantly lower yield-scaled N2O emissions.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
increasing N use efficiencye0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions with increasing N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The analysis identifies yield thresholds for maize, wheat and rice in systems with lower emissions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
>10 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
production systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in N 2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha −1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha −1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha −1 (rice), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat systems above 6.6 Mg ha −1 were identified in the reduced emission relationship.

Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
6.6 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
production systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in N 2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha −1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha −1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha −1 (rice), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice systems above 6.8 Mg ha −1 were identified in the reduced emission relationship.

Outcome
N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
6.8 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
production systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in N 2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha −1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha −1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha −1 (rice), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing N fertilization by up to 30% reduced yield-scaled emissions at similar or higher cereal yields.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
reducing N fertilization by up to 30%e0
Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
similar or even higher cereal yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced‐efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimizing timing and placement of fertilizer reduced yield-scaled emissions at similar or higher cereal yields.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
similar or even higher cereal yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced‐efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced-efficiency N fertilizers reduced yield-scaled emissions at similar or higher cereal yields.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and riceOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
using enhanced‐efficiency N fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
similar or even higher cereal yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced‐efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize, wheat, and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.