Paper · 2024 · New Phytologist

Brown planthopper infestation on rice reduces plant susceptibility to Meloidogyne graminicola by reducing root sugar allocation

Liying Xiao; Godelieve Gheysen; Mingwei Yang; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Plants are simultaneously attacked by different pests that rely on sugars uptake from plants. An understanding of the role of plant sugar allocation in these multipartite interactions is limited. Here, we characterized the expression patterns of sucrose transporter genes and evaluated the impact of targeted transporter gene mutants and brown planthopper (BPH) phloem-feeding and oviposition on root sugar allocation and BPH-reduced rice susceptibility to Meloidogyne graminicola. We found that the sugar transporter genes OsSUT1 and OsSUT2 are induced at BPH oviposition sites. OsSUT2 mutants showed a higher resistance to gravid BPH than to nymph BPH, and this was correlated with callose deposition, as reflected in a different effect on M. graminicola infection. BPH phloem-feeding caused inhibition of callose deposition that was counteracted by BPH oviposition. Meanwhile, this pivotal role of sugar allocation in BPH-reduced rice susceptibility to M. graminicola was validated on rice cultivar RHT harbouring BPH resistance genes Bph3 and Bph17. In conclusion, we demonstrated that rice susceptibility to M. graminicola is regulated by BPH phloem-feeding and oviposition on rice through differences in plant sugar allocation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown planthopper oviposition sites induce expression of the sugar transporter genes OsSUT1 and OsSUT2 in rice.

Interactor
BPHe1pest
Gene
OsSUT1 and OsSUT2e1
Outcome
sugar transporter genese1
Direction
inducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sugar transporter genes OsSUT1 and OsSUT2 are induced at BPH oviposition sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsSUT2 mutant rice showed higher resistance to gravid brown planthopper than to nymph brown planthopper.

Material
OsSUT2 mutantse2
Treatment
gravid BPHe2
Interactor
BPHe2pest
Gene
OsSUT2e2
Outcome
resistancee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
nymph BPHe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“OsSUT2 mutants showed a higher resistance to gravid BPH than to nymph BPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–653 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher resistance of OsSUT2 mutants was correlated with callose deposition.

Material
OsSUT2 mutantse2
Outcome
callose depositione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“OsSUT2 mutants showed a higher resistance to gravid BPH than to nymph BPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–653 · show in text ↑
e3

“this was correlated with callose deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown planthopper phloem-feeding inhibited callose deposition in rice.

Treatment
BPH phloem-feedinge4
Interactor
BPHe4pest
Outcome
callose depositione4
Direction
inhibitione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“BPH phloem-feeding caused inhibition of callose deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown planthopper oviposition counteracted the inhibition of callose deposition.

Treatment
BPH ovipositione5
Interactor
BPHe5pest
Outcome
callose depositione5
Direction
counteractede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“inhibition of callose deposition that was counteracted by BPH oviposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice susceptibility to Meloidogyne graminicola is regulated by brown planthopper phloem-feeding and oviposition through differences in plant sugar allocation.

Treatment
BPH phloem-feeding and ovipositione6
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae6pest
Second interactor
BPHe6pest
Outcome
rice susceptibility to M. graminicolae6
Qualifier
through differences in plant sugar allocatione6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e6

“rice susceptibility to M. graminicola is regulated by BPH phloem-feeding and oviposition on rice through differences in plant sugar allocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown planthopper reduced rice susceptibility to Meloidogyne graminicola in cultivar RHT carrying Bph3 and Bph17.

Material
RHTe7
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae7pest
Second interactor
BPHe7pest
Gene
Bph3 and Bph17e7
Outcome
rice susceptibility to M. graminicolae7
Direction
reducede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“infestation on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–37 · show in text ↑
e7

“this pivotal role of sugar allocation in BPH-reduced rice susceptibility to M. graminicola was validated on rice cultivar RHT harbouring BPH resistance genes Bph3 and Bph17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1052 · show in text ↑

Nilaparvata lugens · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.