Paper · 2024 · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Screening of cadmium resistant bacteria and their growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under cadmium stress

Ying Chen; Xinlin Wu; Zhengxin Lin; et al.

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution of agricultural soils, especially from cadmium (Cd) contaminationcaused serious problems in both food security and economy. Sorghum bicolor (L.) showed a great potential in phytoremediation of Cd contamination due to its fast growth, high yield and easy harvesting. However, the growth of S. bicolor plants tends to be inhibited under Cd exposure, which limited its application for Cd remediation. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria may enhance the Cd resistance of S. bicolor and thus improve its Cd removal efficiency. In this study, three Cd-resistant bacteria were screened based on Cd and acid tolerance and identified as Bacillus velezensis QZG6, Enterobacter cloacae QZS3 and Bacillus cereus QZS8, by 16S rRNA sequencing. Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strains QZG6, QZS3 or QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 31.52%, 50.20% and 26.93%, respectively, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure. The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 65.74%, 31.52%, and 80.91%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3. For pot experiment, strains QZG6, QZS3 and QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 47.30%, 19.27% and 58.47%, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure. The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 67.20%, 22.40%, and 40.65%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3. All these three strains significantly increased the Cd removal efficiency of the plants by 42.16% (QZG6), 18.76% (QZS3) and 21.06% (QZS8). To investigate the bacterial characteristics associated with growth promotion of S. bicolor plants, the ability on nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, siderophores production, and phytohormones production were determined. All the strains were able to fix nitrogen. Phosphorus release was observed for strains QZG6 (inorganic or organic phosphorus) and QZS3 (inorganic phosphorus). Both QZG6 and QZS8 were able to produce siderophores, while only QZG6 was positive for ACC deaminase. All the strains produced IAA, SA and GA. These results indicated that the three strains promoted the plant growth under Cd stress, probably through Cd detoxification by siderophores, as well as through growth regulation by N/P nutrient supply and phytohormone. The present study showed a great potential of the three Cd-resistant strains combined with S. bicolor plants in the remediation of Cd-polluted soils, which may provide a new insight into combining the advantages of microbes and plants to improve the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three Cd-resistant bacteria were identified as Bacillus velezensis QZG6, Enterobacter cloacae QZS3 and Bacillus cereus QZS8 by 16S rRNA sequencing.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
Bacillus velezensis QZG6Bacillus velezensise1symbiont
Second interactor
Enterobacter cloacae QZS3Enterobacter cloacaee1symbiont
Outcome
Cd-resistant bacteriae1
Qualifier
by 16S rRNA sequencinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“three Cd-resistant bacteria were screened based on Cd and acid tolerance and identified as Bacillus velezensis QZG6, Enterobacter cloacae QZS3 and Bacillus cereus QZS8, by 16S rRNA sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZG6 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 31.52% under Cd exposure in hydroponic culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strainse1
Interactor
QZG6e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
31.52%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
hydroponice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strains QZG6, QZS3 or QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 31.52%, 50.20% and 26.93%, respectively, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 50.20% under Cd exposure in hydroponic culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strainse1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
50.20%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
hydroponice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strains QZG6, QZS3 or QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 31.52%, 50.20% and 26.93%, respectively, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS8 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 26.93% under Cd exposure in hydroponic culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strainse1
Interactor
QZS8e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
26.93%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
hydroponice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Inoculation of hydroponic plants with strains QZG6, QZS3 or QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 31.52%, 50.20% and 26.93%, respectively, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced SOD activity by 65.74% in Cd-stressed sorghum (hydroponic).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
activity of SODe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
65.74%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 65.74%, 31.52%, and 80.91%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced POD activity by 31.52% in Cd-stressed sorghum (hydroponic).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
PODe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
31.52%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 65.74%, 31.52%, and 80.91%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced MDA content by 80.91% in Cd-stressed sorghum (hydroponic).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
reducede1
Value
80.91%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 65.74%, 31.52%, and 80.91%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced SOD activity by 67.20% in Cd-stressed sorghum (pot).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
activity of SODe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
67.20%e1
Setting
pot experimente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 67.20%, 22.40%, and 40.65%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1510 · show in text ↑
e2

“For pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced POD activity by 22.40% in Cd-stressed sorghum (pot).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
PODe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
22.40%e1
Setting
pot experimente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 67.20%, 22.40%, and 40.65%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1510 · show in text ↑
e2

“For pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation reduced MDA content by 40.65% in Cd-stressed sorghum (pot).

Taxon
S. bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculated with the strains QZS3e1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
reducede1
Value
40.65%e1
Setting
pot experimente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The activity of SOD, POD and MDA content in Cd-stressed S. bicolor plants were reduced of 67.20%, 22.40%, and 40.65%, respectively, when inoculated with the strains QZS3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1510 · show in text ↑
e2

“For pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZG6 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 47.30% under Cd exposure in pot culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
strainse1
Interactor
QZG6e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
47.30%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For pot experiment, strains QZG6, QZS3 and QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 47.30%, 19.27% and 58.47%, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 19.27% under Cd exposure in pot culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
strainse1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
19.27%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For pot experiment, strains QZG6, QZS3 and QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 47.30%, 19.27% and 58.47%, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS8 inoculation significantly increased sorghum biomass by 58.47% under Cd exposure in pot culture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
strainse1
Interactor
QZS8e1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
58.47%e1
Qualifier
under Cd exposuree1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1
Setting
pot experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For pot experiment, strains QZG6, QZS3 and QZS8 significantly promoted the biomass of sorghum plants by 47.30%, 19.27% and 58.47%, compared with those of uninoculated plants under Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZG6 increased Cd removal efficiency of sorghum plants by 42.16%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
these three strainse1
Interactor
QZG6e1symbiont
Outcome
Cd removal efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
42.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All these three strains significantly increased the Cd removal efficiency of the plants by 42.16% (QZG6), 18.76% (QZS3) and 21.06% (QZS8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS3 increased Cd removal efficiency of sorghum plants by 18.76%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
these three strainse1
Interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
Cd removal efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.76%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All these three strains significantly increased the Cd removal efficiency of the plants by 42.16% (QZG6), 18.76% (QZS3) and 21.06% (QZS8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain QZS8 increased Cd removal efficiency of sorghum plants by 21.06%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
these three strainse1
Interactor
QZS8e1symbiont
Outcome
Cd removal efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.06%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All these three strains significantly increased the Cd removal efficiency of the plants by 42.16% (QZG6), 18.76% (QZS3) and 21.06% (QZS8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus release was observed for strain QZG6 (inorganic or organic phosphorus) and strain QZS3 (inorganic phosphorus).

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
QZG6e1symbiont
Second interactor
QZS3e1symbiont
Outcome
Phosphorus releasee1
Qualifier
inorganic or organic phosphoruse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phosphorus release was observed for strains QZG6 (inorganic or organic phosphorus) and QZS3 (inorganic phosphorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2040 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strains QZG6 and QZS8 produced siderophores; only QZG6 was ACC deaminase positive.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
QZG6e1symbiont
Second interactor
QZS8e1symbiont
Outcome
produce siderophorese1
Qualifier
only QZG6 was positive for ACC deaminasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Both QZG6 and QZS8 were able to produce siderophores, while only QZG6 was positive for ACC deaminase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2142 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All strains were able to fix nitrogen and produced IAA, SA and GA.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
strainse1symbiont
Outcome
fix nitrogene1
Qualifier
produced IAA, SA and GAe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All the strains were able to fix nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1924 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the strains produced IAA, SA and GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2183 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that the strains promote sorghum growth under Cd stress probably through siderophore-mediated Cd detoxification and N/P nutrition and phytohormones.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Compound
siderophorese1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Qualifier
Cd detoxificatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results indicated that the three strains promoted the plant growth under Cd stress, probably through Cd detoxification by siderophores, as well as through growth regulation by N/P nutrient supply and phytohormone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2185–2403 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.