Paper · 2023 · The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Agronomy

Wheat Growth Parameters in Response to Irrigation Salinity in Wheat—Triticum aestivum L.

Brajesh Kumar; Naresh Kumar Arora; Raman Kumar; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crops grown on salt-affected soils may experience physiological drought stress, ion toxicity, and mineral shortage, resulting in lower growth and output. Salinity is the most important abiotic factor limiting crop development and output globally. Improving agri-food production in salt-prone locations is critical for meeting rising food demands in the near future. A pot experiment was conducted to study the impact of saline irrigation water on the chemical properties of sandy loam soil and their influence on growth, yield, and other biometric parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Cv KRL 213 in the farmer’s field at Karnal. Three irrigation water treatments, i.e., Tube well water (TW), saline water (SW1, ECiw 10.0 dS m−1, SAR 5.0 mmol1/2 L−1/2), and concentrated saline water (SW2, ECiw 10.0 dS m−1, SAR 5.0 mmol1/2L−1/2), were applied in reclaimed normal soil (pHs 7.5 and ECe 1.0 dS m−1). The results showed that, when low-quality water was applied to normal soil, salt increased, increasing the likelihood of normal soil deterioration. Continuous irrigation with concentrated salt water (SW2) raised the ECe of the root zone soil, which had a negative impact on wheat crop mortality (approximately 70%). In post-wheat samples, soil organic carbon, calcium carbonate, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) remained constant across all water treatments. Concentrated salty water (SW2) is not advised on its own, but it can be used in conjunction with other management practices (by mixing with rain, pond, or canal water) to reduce the negative impacts on soil chemical characteristics and crop development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-quality irrigation water increased salt in normal soil.

Treatment
low-quality watere0
Outcome
salte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when low-quality water was applied to normal soil, salt increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrated saline irrigation raised root-zone soil ECe.

Treatment
concentrated salt water (SW2)e0
Outcome
ECe of the root zone soile0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous irrigation with concentrated salt water (SW2) raised the ECe of the root zone soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrated saline irrigation affected wheat mortality of approximately 70%.

Treatment
concentrated salt water (SW2)e1
Outcome
wheat crop mortalitye0
Value
approximately 70%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative impact on wheat crop mortality (approximately 70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous irrigation with concentrated salt water (SW2) raised the ECe of the root zone soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon, calcium carbonate and CEC remained constant across water treatments.

Outcome
soil organic carbon, calcium carbonate, and cation exchange capacity (CEC)e0
Direction
remained constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic carbon, calcium carbonate, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) remained constant across all water treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1364 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–590 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against using SW2 alone, suggesting mixing it with other water.

Outcome
by mixing with rain, pond, or canal watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrated salty water (SW2) is not advised on its own, but it can be used in conjunction with other management practices (by mixing with rain, pond, or canal water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1533 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–590 · show in text ↑

salinity · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.