Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Effects of Different Water Storage and Fertilizer Retention Substrates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry

Xiaofei Tang; Yonghui Li; Mengying Fang; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To address the problems of inadequate water and fertilizer retention performance of the substrate, which results in the waste of water and fertilizer resources and then contributes to existing agricultural non-point source pollution, this study selected raw materials with different water retention performances for substrate compounding and explored their water retention performance and impact on the growth, yield and quality of strawberries. The experimental setup utilized the strawberry cultivar ‘Hongyan’ as the test subject and incorporated different proportions of vermicompost, coconut bran, biochar and humic acid into the organic fertilizer. A total of 12 treatment groups were formed across three gradients, involving different proportions of vermicompost with 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 proportions of coconut bran/biochar and 0.05, 0.15 and 0.20 proportions of humic acid. To evaluate the water retention performance, uniform water and fertilizer regulations were applied. The results revealed that the treatment groups T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1) exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity, lower water infiltration rates, and better water retention performances, but there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Among them, T4 could effectively improve the nutrient content of the substrate, and the substrate nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) increased by 5.80% compared with CK2. Also, plant total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) uptake increased by 81.18% and 4.74%, respectively, compared with CK2, which in turn promoted the growth and development of the plant and improved the fruit yield and quality to a certain extent. Meanwhile, T4 had the highest urease and catalase activities, with sucrase activity ranking second only to T1. In contrast, T5 demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving the average fruit weight and maximum fruit weight, registering increases of 22.98% and 36.22% compared to CK2, respectively, but the effect on the total yield was less pronounced. A comprehensive evaluation of strawberry growth found that the T4 treatment was superior. In conclusion, the ratio of vermicompost and coconut bran at 0.5:0.1 improved and promoted the substrate water retention performance and strawberry growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate treatments T4 and T5 exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1)e0
Outcome
water absorption multiplicitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment groups T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1) exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate treatments T4 and T5 exhibited lower water infiltration rates.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1)e0
Outcome
water infiltration ratese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment groups T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1) exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity, lower water infiltration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate treatments T4 and T5 showed better water retention performance.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1)e0
Outcome
water retention performancese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment groups T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1) exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity, lower water infiltration rates, and better water retention performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant difference in water retention results between treatments T4 and T5.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1)e0
Outcome
water retention performancese0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment groups T4 (vermicompost:coconut bran = 0.5:0.1) and T5 (vermicompost:biochar = 0.5:0.1) exhibited higher water absorption multiplicity, lower water infiltration rates, and better water retention performances, but there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 effectively improved the nutrient content of the substrate.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
nutrient content of the substratee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve the nutrient content of the substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) under T4 increased by 5.80% compared with CK2.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
substrate nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.80%e0
Comparator
CK2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve the nutrient content of the substrate, and the substrate nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) increased by 5.80% compared with CK2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant total nitrogen (TN) uptake under T4 increased by 81.18% compared with CK2.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
plant total nitrogen (TN)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
81.18%e1
Comparator
CK2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) uptake increased by 81.18% and 4.74%, respectively, compared with CK2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant total phosphorus (TP) uptake under T4 increased by 4.74% compared with CK2.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
total phosphorus (TP) uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.74%e1
Comparator
CK2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) uptake increased by 81.18% and 4.74%, respectively, compared with CK2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 promoted the growth and development of the strawberry plant.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
growth and development of the plante1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoted the growth and development of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 improved fruit yield and quality to a certain extent.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
to a certain extente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 could effectively improve”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved the fruit yield and quality to a certain extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the highest urease and catalase activities.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
urease and catalase activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 had the highest urease and catalase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrase activity under T4 ranked second only to T1.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
sucrase activitye0
Direction
ranking second only to T1e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 had the highest urease and catalase activities, with sucrase activity ranking second only to T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased average fruit weight by 22.98% compared with CK2.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
22.98%e0
Comparator
CK2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving the average fruit weight and maximum fruit weight, registering increases of 22.98% and 36.22% compared to CK2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased maximum fruit weight by 36.22% compared with CK2.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
maximum fruit weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
36.22%e0
Comparator
CK2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving the average fruit weight and maximum fruit weight, registering increases of 22.98% and 36.22% compared to CK2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of T5 on total yield was less pronounced.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
less pronouncede0
Comparator
CK2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving the average fruit weight and maximum fruit weight, registering increases of 22.98% and 36.22% compared to CK2, respectively, but the effect on the total yield was less pronounced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a comprehensive evaluation of strawberry growth, the T4 treatment was superior.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
T4 treatmente0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comprehensive evaluation of strawberry growth found that the T4 treatment was superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2167 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

biochar · soil: physics · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.