Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

The potential of postharvest zinc treatment for preservation of pomegranate aril quality

Reihaneh Aminzade; Asghar Ramezanian; Saeid Eshghi; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A short shelf life usually limits the distribution and supply of pomegranate arils. Since zinc (Zn) has an indispensable role in the nutrient integrity of our diet and is effective in suppressing pathogens, this study was done as two separate experiments of pre-harvest spraying and postharvest dipping of arils with two zinc supplements, including nano zinc oxide (nZnO) and zinc sulfate (ZnSO 4 ). The optimized concentration of both sources was used in the experiment. The pre-harvest treatment failed to extend the shelf life of arils, and, ultimately, the arils decayed after 15 days. However, the postharvest zinc treatment significantly (P < 0.01) affected all measured indices. Also, zinc sulfate was more effective than nZnO. Zn uptake was higher in postharvest treatments because exogenous Zn was in direct contact with the aril surface. After dissolving in water, Zn ions in sulfate bind to the membrane of microorganisms and thus delay cell division and microbial growth cycle. The solubility of zinc oxide nanoparticles in water is poor. Using the ZnSO 4 treatment (0.8%W/V) effectively maintained the values of titratable acidity (TA), total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble solids (TSS), anthocyanin content, and antioxidant activity. Also, this treatment significantly controlled weight loss in the arils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest zinc spraying did not extend aril shelf life; arils decayed after 15 days.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
pre-harvest treatmente0
Outcome
shelf life of arilse0
Direction
failed to extende0
Value
15 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest treatment failed to extend the shelf life of arils, and, ultimately, the arils decayed after 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest zinc significantly affected all measured quality indices.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
postharvest zinc treatmente0
Outcome
all measured indicese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the postharvest zinc treatment significantly (P < 0.01) affected all measured indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate was more effective than nano zinc oxide.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
zinc sulfatee0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
nZnOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc sulfate was more effective than nZnO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aril zinc uptake was higher following postharvest than preharvest treatment.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
postharvest treatmentse0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn uptake was higher in postharvest treatments because exogenous Zn was in direct contact with the aril surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate at 0.8% maintained acidity, phenolics and soluble solids.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4 treatment (0.8%W/V)e0
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA), total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the ZnSO 4 treatment (0.8%W/V) effectively maintained the values of titratable acidity (TA), total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble solids (TSS), anthocyanin content, and antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate at 0.8% maintained anthocyanins and antioxidant activity.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ZnSO 4 treatment (0.8%W/V)e0
Outcome
anthocyanin content, and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the ZnSO 4 treatment (0.8%W/V) effectively maintained the values of titratable acidity (TA), total phenolic content (TPC), total soluble solids (TSS), anthocyanin content, and antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate significantly controlled aril weight loss.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
weight loss in the arilse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment significantly controlled weight loss in the arils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.