Paper · 2023 · Crop Science

Recurrent selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in a durum wheat population

Runhao Wang; Jason Axtman; Yueqiang Leng; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a devastating fungal disease of wheat. Since early 1990s, frequent FHB epidemics in major wheat‐growing regions have caused massive economic losses. Developing FHB‐resistant varieties is key to minimize the loss caused by the disease. In durum wheat ( Triticum turgidum L. ssp . durum ), however, it is challenged by lack of resistant sources. Introgression of resistance genes from wild relatives and bread wheat has resulted in some durum wheat lines with moderate resistance. Due to its complex genetic nature, integrating more resistance genes with moderate and even minor effects promises to provide high and durable FHB resistance. In this study, a base population was developed using diverse resistant lines and elite durum wheat breeding lines as founders and went through three cycles of phenotypic selection from 2019 to 2022, with FHB severity decreased by 34%. Six S 0:1 lines in Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 populations exhibited significantly lower FHB severity than the moderately susceptible check variety ND Riveland. The results suggested that recurrent phenotypic selection could effectively improve FHB resistance. Analysis of the founders and Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 populations with 2706 single nucleotide polymorphism markers indicated that there was little decrease in genetic variation due to selection. Genome‐wide association analysis found no markers significantly associated with FHB severity. Genomic prediction accuracies based on cross‐validation for FHB severity, plant height, and days‐to‐flowering were 0.51, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively. Recurrent genomic selection can shorten the select cycle to 4 months and therefore is promising to accelerate genetic improvement of FHB severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB severity fell by 34% over three selection cycles.

Treatment
three cycles of phenotypic selectione0
Outcome
FHB severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
founderse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a base population was developed using diverse resistant lines and elite durum wheat breeding lines as founders and went through three cycles of phenotypic selection from 2019 to 2022, with FHB severity decreased by 34%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six selected lines had significantly lower FHB severity than ND Riveland.

Material
Six S 0:1 linese0
Outcome
FHB severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ND Rivelande0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Six S 0:1 lines in Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 populations exhibited significantly lower FHB severity than the moderately susceptible check variety ND Riveland.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection caused little decrease in genetic variation.

Treatment
selectione0
Outcome
genetic variatione0
Direction
little decreasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of the founders and Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 populations with 2706 single nucleotide polymorphism markers indicated that there was little decrease in genetic variation due to selection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1354 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GWAS found no markers significantly associated with FHB severity.

Gene
markerse0
Outcome
FHB severitye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Genome‐wide association analysis found no markers significantly associated with FHB severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-validated genomic prediction accuracy for FHB severity was 0.51.

Outcome
FHB severitye0
Value
0.51e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Genomic prediction accuracies based on cross‐validation for FHB severity, plant height, and days‐to‐flowering were 0.51, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1599 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-validated genomic prediction accuracy for plant height was 0.69.

Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
0.69e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Genomic prediction accuracies based on cross‐validation for FHB severity, plant height, and days‐to‐flowering were 0.51, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1599 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-validated genomic prediction accuracy for days-to-flowering was 0.61.

Outcome
days‐to‐floweringe0
Value
0.61e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Genomic prediction accuracies based on cross‐validation for FHB severity, plant height, and days‐to‐flowering were 0.51, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1599 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recurrent genomic selection could shorten the selection cycle to four months.

Treatment
Recurrent genomic selectione0
Outcome
shorten the select cyclee0
Value
4 monthse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Recurrent genomic selection can shorten the select cycle to 4 months and therefore is promising to accelerate genetic improvement of FHB severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1746 · show in text ↑