Abstract
The numerous benefits and uses of chilies have led to a constant increase in demand as the population of Indonesia grows. Anthracnose is a disease that often affects chili peppers and is caused by the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Farmers typically use fungicides to control anthracnose. Common active ingredients applied for anthracnose control include Mancozeb, Chlorothalonil, Propineb, and copper hydroxide. The research was conducted in the village of Ambit, Waled District, Cirebon Regency, West Java Province. The study took place over three months, from July to September 2023. The research method used a Randomized Group Design (RGD) consisting of five treatments with different active fungicide ingredients and a control (without treatment), repeated five times, resulting in 25 experimental plots. The treatments were A (Copper hydroxide active ingredient), B (Mancozeb active ingredient), C (Chlorothalonil active ingredient), D (Propineb active ingredient), E (Control /no fungicide). The fungicide concentration used was 2 ml/liter. The experimental results showed that the various active fungicide treatments had a significant effect on the intensity of anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) and other diseases like Pepper yellow leaf curl. The Chlorothalonil active ingredient showed the lowest intensity of disease when compared to the other treatments, even with other active ingredients that were tested. Fungicide treatments had a significant impact on chili yields per plot compared to the control treatment without fungicide. The Chlorothalonil active ingredient treatment yielded higher chili harvest results compared to other treatments, reaching 15.97 kg/plot or 15.97 tons/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The tested fungicides significantly affected anthracnose intensity.
- Treatment
- various active fungicide treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen - Outcome
- intensity of anthracnose diseasee0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“various active fungicide treatments had a significant effect on the intensity of anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides)”
Claim · model-written summary
The tested fungicides significantly affected pepper yellow leaf curl intensity.
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“various active fungicide treatments had a significant effect on the intensity of anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) and other diseases like Pepper yellow leaf curl”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorothalonil yielded the lowest disease intensity among treatments.
- Treatment
- Chlorothalonil active ingrediente0
- Outcome
- intensity of diseasee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The Chlorothalonil active ingredient showed the lowest intensity of disease when compared to the other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide treatments significantly affected chili yield per plot relative to no fungicide.
- Taxon
- chilie0
- Treatment
- Fungicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- chili yields per plote0
- Comparator
- control treatment without fungicidee0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Fungicide treatments had a significant impact on chili yields per plot compared to the control treatment without fungicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorothalonil gave a higher chili yield than other treatments, at 15.97 kg/plot.
Verbatim
e0“The Chlorothalonil active ingredient treatment yielded higher chili harvest results compared to other treatments, reaching 15.97 kg/plot or 15.97 tons/ha”
The same questions in other papers
chlorothalonil · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.