Abstract
An agronomic investigation was carried out at Rahuri, Maharashtra, India during summer 2018, to study the ef- fect of irrigation schedule and foliar application of potash on growth, yield and quality of summer greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek]. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with 3 replications. The experiment con- sists of 12 treatments involving 4 main-plot treatments, i.e. irrigation schedules at 40, 60, 80 and at 100 mm CPE and the subplot treatments are foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering, at pod-development stage and 3 at flowering and pod-development stage. Scheduling of irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, plant spread, number of branches, dry matter and seed yield of summer greengram (13.31 q/ha) at harvesting and it was at par with treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (13.08 q/ha). Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stage resulted in 3 significantly higher growth attributes and seed yield of summer green gram (12.42 q/ha). Among the different irri- gation schedules, treatment irrigation at 40 mm CPE resulted in the maximum gross monetary returns (`67,560/ ha), net monetary returns (`33,705/ha) and benefit: cost (B : C) ratio (1.99) and it was at par with treatment irriga- tion at 60 mm CPE having net monetary returns (`31,358/ha) and B:C ratio (1.99). The foliar application of 1% pot- ash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher gross monetary returns 3 (`62,651/ha), net monetary returns (`30,917/ha), and B : C ratio (1.97). Irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar applica- tion of 1% potash at flowering and pod-development stage to summer greengram found suitable preposition to achieve the highest grain yield as well as net monetary returns
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 mm CPE raised growth attributes significantly.
- Taxon
- summer greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Treatment
- irrigation at 40 mm CPEe0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves, leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Scheduling of irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, plant spread, number of branches, dry matter and seed yield of summer greengram (13.31 q/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 mm CPE yielded 13.31 q/ha seed.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 40 mm CPEe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 13.31 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Scheduling of irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher growth attributes like plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, plant spread, number of branches, dry matter and seed yield of summer greengram (13.31 q/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 60 mm CPE yielded 13.08 q/ha and was at par with 40 mm CPE.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was at par with treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (13.08 q/ha)”
e1“seed yield of summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development raised growth attributes.
- Taxon
- summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- growth attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stage resulted in 3 significantly higher growth attributes and seed yield of summer green gram (12.42 q/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development raised seed yield to 12.42 q/ha.
- Taxon
- summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.42 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stage resulted in 3 significantly higher growth attributes and seed yield of summer green gram (12.42 q/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 mm CPE maximized gross returns at `67,560/ ha.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0t1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 40 mm CPE resulted in the maximum gross monetary returns (`67,560/ ha)”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 mm CPE maximized net returns at `33,705/ha.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0t1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 40 mm CPE resulted in the maximum gross monetary returns (`67,560/ ha), net monetary returns (`33,705/ha)”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 mm CPE gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1.99.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0e1t1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit: cost (B : C) ratio (1.99)”
e1“treatment irrigation at 40 mm CPE”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar potash produced gross returns of `62,651/ha.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0t1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar application of 1% pot- ash (KNO ) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher gross monetary returns 3 (`62,651/ha)”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar potash produced net returns of `30,917/ha.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0e1t1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net monetary returns (`30,917/ha)”
e1“foliar application of 1% pot- ash (KNO )”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar potash gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1.97.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0e1t1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B : C ratio (1.97)”
e1“foliar application of 1% pot- ash (KNO )”
t1“summer greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 60 mm CPE irrigation with 1% potash at flowering and pod development.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Outcome
- Irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar applica- tion of 1% potash at flowering and pod-development stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar applica- tion of 1% potash at flowering and pod-development stage to summer greengram found suitable preposition to achieve the highest grain yield as well as net monetary returns”
The same questions in other papers
stage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →potassium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →irrigation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
212 papers more in this group
See all 216 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.