Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Performance of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in response to planting methods and seed rates under north-western Indian conditions

RENU BALA; BUTA SINGH DHILLON; AMANDEEP SINGH BRAR; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of 201617 and 201718 at Ludhiana, Punjab with the objective to evaluate the effect of sowing methods and seed rates on productivity, quality and economics of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design keeping sowing methods, i.e. bed (1 row), bed (2 rows), ridge (1 row), ridge (2 rows), flat (60 cm) and flat (30 cm), in main plots and seed rates, i.e. 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 kg/ha, in subplots. Results revealed that, the higher plant population under bed (2 rows) and better yield attributes under ridge (1 row) resulted in the highest root yield and net returns. Although crop sown as flat (30 and 60 cm) also gave root yield similar to former sowing methods but roots obtained under flat sowing were physically distorted, i.e. forked and cracked. Growth, photosynthetic parameters and root yield and benefit: cost ratio showed increasing trend only up to 1.0 kg/ha seed rate but shoot yield increased linearly up to 1.5 kg/ha seed rate. Final plant population, plant height at harvesting, root length and shoot yield had direct positive effect on root yield but dry matter of root at harvesting had positive indirect effect on root yield via. plant population

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed sowing with two rows gave a higher plant population in chicory.

Treatment
bed (2 rows)e1
Outcome
plant populatione1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher plant population under bed (2 rows) and better yield attributes under ridge (1 row) resulted in the highest root yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge sowing with one row gave better yield attributes in chicory.

Treatment
ridge (1 row)e1
Outcome
yield attributese1
Direction
bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher plant population under bed (2 rows) and better yield attributes under ridge (1 row) resulted in the highest root yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge sowing with one row gave the highest root yield and net returns in chicory.

Treatment
ridge (1 row)e1
Outcome
root yield and net returnse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher plant population under bed (2 rows) and better yield attributes under ridge (1 row) resulted in the highest root yield and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat sowing at 30 and 60 cm gave chicory root yield similar to the other sowing methods.

Treatment
flat (30 and 60 cm)e1
Outcome
root yielde1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
former sowing methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Although crop sown as flat (30 and 60 cm) also gave root yield similar to former sowing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of chicory sown flat were physically distorted, forked and cracked.

Treatment
flat sowinge1
Outcome
physically distortede1
Qualifier
forked and crackede1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots obtained under flat sowing were physically distorted, i.e. forked and cracked”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth, photosynthetic parameters, root yield and benefit:cost ratio of chicory showed an increasing trend only up to 1.0 kg/ha seed rate.

Treatment
1.0 kg/ha seed ratee1
Outcome
Growth, photosynthetic parameters and root yield and benefit: cost ratioe1
Direction
increasing trende1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Growth, photosynthetic parameters and root yield and benefit: cost ratio showed increasing trend only up to 1.0 kg/ha seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot yield of chicory increased linearly up to a seed rate of 1.5 kg/ha.

Treatment
1.5 kg/ha seed ratee1
Outcome
shoot yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
linearly up to 1.5 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“shoot yield increased linearly up to 1.5 kg/ha seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final plant population, plant height, root length and shoot yield had a direct positive effect on chicory root yield.

Treatment
Final plant population, plant height at harvesting, root length and shoot yielde1
Outcome
root yielde1
Direction
direct positive effecte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Final plant population, plant height at harvesting, root length and shoot yield had direct positive effect on root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter of chicory roots at harvest had a positive indirect effect on root yield via plant population.

Treatment
dry matter of root at harvestinge1
Outcome
root yielde1
Direction
positive indirect effecte1
Qualifier
via. plant populatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dry matter of root at harvesting had positive indirect effect on root yield via. plant population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cichorium intybus (chicory)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.