Paper · 2013 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of biopesticide formulation on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum): economics and environmental effects

SUMITRA ARORA; ASHOK K KANOJIA; ASHOK KUMAR; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The indigenously prepared biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10% proved to be the best for tomato crop with lowest EIQ-field use ratings resulting in least or negligible impact on environment. The lowest economics involved proves its high social acceptance. Therefore there is a need to opt traditional knowledge as essential and alternate component of pest management, not only for tomato crop, but also to all major crops, to reduce the load and impact of synthetic chemical pesticides for safer environment. If any pesticide schedule or plant protection activity is able to reduce economics involved in the programme along with minimum total EIQ-FUR level, it would definitely add value to the standard of living of farmers by making that technology, socially acceptable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopesticide formulation at 10% gave the lowest EIQ field-use ratings on tomato.

Treatment
biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10%e0
Outcome
EIQ-field use ratingse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The indigenously prepared biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10% proved to be the best for tomato crop with lowest EIQ-field use ratings resulting in least or negligible impact on environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopesticide formulation at 10% gave the lowest economic cost in the tomato pest management programme.

Treatment
biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10%e0
Outcome
economics involvede1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The indigenously prepared biopesticide formulation (BPF) @ 10% proved to be the best for tomato crop with lowest EIQ-field use ratings resulting in least or negligible impact on environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–189 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest economics involved proves its high social acceptance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional knowledge should be an essential alternate component of pest management for tomato and all major crops.

Outcome
traditional knowledge as essential and alternate component of pest managemente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“there is a need to opt traditional knowledge as essential and alternate component of pest management, not only for tomato crop, but also to all major crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–421 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.