Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Response of Microbial Recovery Rate to Straw Return after Calcium Cyanamide Soil Disinfection

Xuewen Xie; Lida Chen; Yanxia Shi; et al.

11
claims
31
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

At present, returning vegetable straw in situ is an effective measure to solve environmental pollution and improve soil properties. However, the direct return of straw to the field can reduce the release rate of soil organic matter and cause serious soilborne diseases. The combined application of calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) and straw can solve this problem. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of CaCN2 combined with pepper straw return on cucumber yield, soil physicochemical properties, and soil microbial communities during 2020 to 2021 in Shandong Province, China. The treatments were designed as follows: (1) calcium cyanamide soil disinfection, CC; (2) fresh pepper straw return, LJ; (3) fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC; and (4) natural soil without straw return treatment, CK. Compared with CK, the LJ+CC treatment significantly improved cucumber production by 20%. The cultivable microbial community in the soil was temporarily inhibited during soil fumigation treatment, and the cultivable bacterial and actinomycete communities in the soil return to their initial levels after the film was removed (harvest period). The numbers of culturable bacteria and actinomycetes in the soil in the LJ+CC treatment were 4.68 × 107 CFU/g and 5.17 × 107 CFU/g, respectively, higher than those in the soil in the CC treatment. The contents of TN and OM in the LJ+CC treatment increased by 13.1% and 13.5%, respectively, compared with that in LJ. Therefore, the LJ+CC treatment enhanced soil fertility and cucumber yields. CaCN2 can promote straw decomposition and straw can promote soil microbial recovery, and their combined application is considered a feasible and sustainable technique for utilizing vegetable residues in the greenhouse. The combination of returning pepper straw to the field and calcium cyanamide technology achieves a win-win situation of resource circulation and economic circulation by converting agricultural waste into fertilizer before being put into production. Based on this, it is recommended that the straw returning technology receives strong policy support, stimulates researchers to explore the feasibility of different vegetable straw returning to the field, promotes the implementation of this technology achievement, and leverages the environmental benefits of the application of straw returning technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined pepper straw return and calcium cyanamide increased cucumber production by 20% relative to untreated soil.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfectione1
Outcome
cucumber productione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
natural soil without straw return treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the LJ+CC treatment significantly improved cucumber production by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–791 · show in text ↑
e2

“natural soil without straw return treatment, CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–848 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivable soil microbes were temporarily inhibited during fumigation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
soil fumigation treatmente0
Outcome
cultivable microbial community in the soile0
Direction
temporarily inhibitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivable microbial community in the soil was temporarily inhibited during soil fumigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivable bacteria and actinomycetes returned to initial levels after film removal.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
cultivable bacterial and actinomycete communities in the soile0
Direction
return to their initial levelse0
Qualifier
after the film was removed (harvest period)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivable bacterial and actinomycete communities in the soil return to their initial levels after the film was removed (harvest period)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment produced 4.68 × 107 CFU/g culturable soil bacteria, more than calcium cyanamide alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse3
Treatment
fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfectione1
Outcome
culturable bacteriae0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.68 × 107 CFU/ge0
Comparator
calcium cyanamide soil disinfectione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of culturable bacteria and actinomycetes in the soil in the LJ+CC treatment were 4.68 × 107 CFU/g and 5.17 × 107 CFU/g, respectively, higher than those in the soil in the CC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–791 · show in text ↑
e2

“calcium cyanamide soil disinfection, CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–673 · show in text ↑
e3

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment produced 5.17 × 107 CFU/g culturable soil actinomycetes, more than calcium cyanamide alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse3
Treatment
fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfectione1
Outcome
actinomycetes in the soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.17 × 107 CFU/ge0
Comparator
calcium cyanamide soil disinfectione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of culturable bacteria and actinomycetes in the soil in the LJ+CC treatment were 4.68 × 107 CFU/g and 5.17 × 107 CFU/g, respectively, higher than those in the soil in the CC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–791 · show in text ↑
e2

“calcium cyanamide soil disinfection, CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–673 · show in text ↑
e3

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased soil TN by 13.1% versus straw return alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse3
Treatment
fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfectione1
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.1%e0
Comparator
fresh pepper straw returne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of TN and OM in the LJ+CC treatment increased by 13.1% and 13.5%, respectively, compared with that in LJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–791 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh pepper straw return, LJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–708 · show in text ↑
e3

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased soil OM by 13.5% versus straw return alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse3
Treatment
fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfectione1
Outcome
OMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.5%e0
Comparator
fresh pepper straw returne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of TN and OM in the LJ+CC treatment increased by 13.1% and 13.5%, respectively, compared with that in LJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh pepper straw return combined with calcium cyanamide disinfection, LJ+CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–791 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh pepper straw return, LJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–708 · show in text ↑
e3

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude calcium cyanamide promotes straw decomposition.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
CaCN2e0
Outcome
straw decompositione0
Direction
promotee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaCN2 can promote straw decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1621 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude straw promotes soil microbial recovery.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
strawe0
Outcome
soil microbial recoverye0
Direction
promotee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw can promote soil microbial recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1667 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors consider combined application feasible and sustainable for vegetable residue use in greenhouses.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
feasible and sustainable technique for utilizing vegetable residues in the greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their combined application is considered a feasible and sustainable technique for utilizing vegetable residues in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend policy support for straw returning technology.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
straw returning technology receives strong policy supporte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that the straw returning technology receives strong policy support”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2151 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–474 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.