Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Adding Organic Fertilizer (Humus) Perl Humus on some Vegetative Growth Characteristics of Grape Cultivars Shatur Al-anz and Olivette Noire (Vitis Vinifera L.)

Idris Hussein Abdullah; Mahmoud Fadel Latif

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the effects of organic fertilizer PERL HUMUS on the vegetative growth traits of young Shatur Al-anz and Olivette noire grape vines in the grape orchard of the Department of Horticulture and Gardens Engineering, College of Agriculture, Tikrit University, during the growing season (2022). The experiment used a split-plot design according to the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two factors: the first factor was the addition of the organic fertilizer PERL HUMUS to the soil at three levels (H0= 0, H1= 150, and H2= 300 gm per seedling) twice before the vegetative buds opened and two months after the first addition. Shatur Al-anz (V1) and Olivette noire (V2) grape varieties are the second factors. Organic fertilizer had a significant effect on most vegetative growth traits, especially the H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine). There was no notable rise in primary branches. The Shatur Al-anz variety significantly outperformed the Olive variety in (the number of main branches) and (wet weight and dry weight).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 fertilizer treatment gave the highest main branch length of 134.04 cm.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
main branch lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
134.04 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 fertilizer treatment gave the highest main branch diameter of 12.74 mm.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.74 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 fertilizer treatment gave the highest wet weight of 19.65 gm.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
wet weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19.65 gme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 fertilizer treatment gave the highest dry weight of 11.02 gm.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.02 gme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 fertilizer treatment gave the highest leaf area of 5.24 m2 per vine.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.24 m2 per vinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“H2 treatment, which had the highest values for main branch length and diameter, wet weight, dry weight, and leaf area (134.04 cm, 12.74 mm, 19.65 gm, 11.02 gm, and 5.24 m2 per vine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer did not notably increase primary branches.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Organic fertilizere1
Outcome
primary branchese0
Direction
no notable risee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no notable rise in primary branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Organic fertilizer had a significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shatur Al-anz had significantly more main branches than Olive.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Shatur Al-anze0
Outcome
number of main branchese0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Olive varietye0

Verbatim

e0

“The Shatur Al-anz variety significantly outperformed the Olive variety in (the number of main branches) and (wet weight and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shatur Al-anz significantly exceeded Olive in wet and dry weight.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Shatur Al-anze0
Outcome
wet weight and dry weighte0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
Olive varietye0

Verbatim

e0

“The Shatur Al-anz variety significantly outperformed the Olive variety in (the number of main branches) and (wet weight and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.