Paper · 2023 · IECAG 2023

Changes in Soil Physico-Chemical Properties and Seedling Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) under Sodic Soil as Affected by Soil Amendments: An Incubation Study

Mohanapriya Ramasamy; Kalpana Rengabashyam; Vijay Aravinth Kumar

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The salinization and sodification of agricultural lands in arid and semi-arid regions of the world are two limiting factors in crop production. In India, an area of about 6.72 million ha is salt-affected, of which 3.77 million ha is sodic soil. To evaluate the reclamation potential of soil amendment, a laboratory incubation study was conducted at the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruchirappalli (2022). Different soil amendments, viz., T1-Pongamia GLM @ 6.25 t ha−1, T2-Pressmud @ 10 t ha−1, T3-CSR GROMOR 25 kg ha−1, T4-Marine gypsum 50% GR, T5-Marine gypsum @ 50% GR + Pongamia GLM 6.25 t ha−1, T6-Marine gypsum 50% GR + Pressmud 10 t ha−1, T7-Marine gypsum 50% GR + CSR GROMOR 25 kg ha−1 and T8-Control (no amendments), were used for incubation. After 90 days of incubation, a pot culture using post-incubated soil was raised to study the seedling parameters of green gram, which was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. The analysis of post-incubated soil using ICP-MS shows higher levels of cations, viz., Ca (+67%), Mg (+65%) and K (+66%), were found in marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control. The same treatment recorded higher chlorophyll, relative water content and seedling vigor index I and II in green gram. The results indicated that marine gypsum + CSR GROMOR had a positive impact on reducing soil sodicity and improving soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gypsum and CSR GROMOR treatment increased soil Ca by 67%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Cae0
Value
+67%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca (+67%), Mg (+65%) and K (+66%), were found in marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment increased soil Mg by 65%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Mge0
Value
+65%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mg (+65%) and K (+66%), were found in marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment increased soil K by 66%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Ke0
Value
+66%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K (+66%), were found in marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment lowered soil pH by 15%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
−15%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment lowered soil EC by 63%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
−63%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment lowered soil ESP by 39%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
ESPe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
−39%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment lowered soil Na by 58%.

Treatment
marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Nae0
Direction
lowere0
Value
−58%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marine gypsum @ 50% GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha−1 with lower values of pH (−15%), EC (−63%), ESP (−39%) and Na (−58%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased chlorophyll, relative water content and seedling vigor indices.

Treatment
same treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll, relative water content and seedling vigor index I and IIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment recorded higher chlorophyll, relative water content and seedling vigor index I and II in green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1365 · show in text ↑

lime · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.