Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Chitooligosaccharide enhanced the efficacy of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02 for the control of tobacco black shank

Xiangnan Zeng; Xin Zhang; Bo Peng; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Tobacco black shank is a devastating soil-borne disease caused by the oomycete Phytophthora nicotianae , severely hamper tobacco production worldwide. However, the synergistic effect of biocontrol bacteria and marine polysaccharides/oligosaccharides on tobacco black shank control was few documented. Methods In this study, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02 (CAS02) and chitooligosaccharide (COS) were screened firstly, and their synergistic antagonistic effect against P. nicotianae and the underlying mechanism were investigated in vitro and in vivo . Results In vitro experiments showed that, compared with the application of CAS02 or COS alone, co-application of CAS02 and COS significantly increased the inhibition rate against P. nicotianae by 11.67% and 63.31%, respectively. Furthermore, co-application of CAS02 and COS disrupted the structure of mycelia to a greater extent. The co-application of CAS02 and COS showed synergistic effect, with the relative control effect maintained above 60% during the 60-day pot experiment, significantly higher than that of application CAS02 or COS alone. The combined application of CAS02 and COS reduced the relative abundance of P. nicotianae in the rhizosphere soil and increased the relative abundance of bacterial taxa potentially involved in disease suppression, such as Nocardioides , Devosia and Bradyrhizobium . Meanwhile, CAS02 and COS synergistically activated salicylic acid ( SA ), ethylene ( ET ), and hypersensitive response ( HR ) defense signaling pathways in tobacco plants. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that co-application of CAS02 and COS remarkably improve the relative control effect against tobacco black shank through multiple pathways and provide a promising strategy for the efficient green control of tobacco black shank.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, co-application of CAS02 and COS increased the inhibition rate against P. nicotianae by 11.67% compared with the application of CAS02 alone.

Treatment
co-application of CAS02 and COSe1
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition rate against P. nicotianaee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11.67%e1
Comparator
application of CAS02e1
Setting
In vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02 (CAS02) and chitooligosaccharide (COS) were screened firstly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“In vitro experiments showed that, compared with the application of CAS02 or COS alone, co-application of CAS02 and COS significantly increased the inhibition rate against P. nicotianae by 11.67% and 63.31%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, co-application of CAS02 and COS increased the inhibition rate against P. nicotianae by 63.31% compared with COS alone.

Treatment
co-application of CAS02 and COSe1
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition rate against P. nicotianaee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
63.31%e1
Comparator
COS alonee1
Setting
In vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02 (CAS02) and chitooligosaccharide (COS) were screened firstly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“In vitro experiments showed that, compared with the application of CAS02 or COS alone, co-application of CAS02 and COS significantly increased the inhibition rate against P. nicotianae by 11.67% and 63.31%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of CAS02 and COS maintained the relative control effect above 60% during a 60-day pot experiment.

Treatment
co-application of CAS02 and COSe2
Outcome
relative control effecte2
Direction
maintainede2
Value
above 60%e2
Setting
60-day pot experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“The co-application of CAS02 and COS showed synergistic effect, with the relative control effect maintained above 60% during the 60-day pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of CAS02 and COS gave a significantly higher relative control effect than CAS02 or COS alone.

Treatment
co-application of CAS02 and COSe2
Outcome
relative control effecte2
Direction
highere3
Comparator
application CAS02 or COS alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“The co-application of CAS02 and COS showed synergistic effect, with the relative control effect maintained above 60% during the 60-day pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1045 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than that of application CAS02 or COS alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of CAS02 and COS disrupted the structure of mycelia to a greater extent.

Treatment
co-application of CAS02 and COSe4
Outcome
structure of myceliae4
Direction
disruptede4
Qualifier
to a greater extente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“co-application of CAS02 and COS disrupted the structure of mycelia to a greater extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–894 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAS02 and COS synergistically activated salicylic acid, ethylene and hypersensitive response defense signaling pathways in tobacco plants.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume5
Treatment
CAS02 and COSe5
Outcome
defense signaling pathwayse5
Direction
activatede5
Qualifier
salicylic acid ( SA ), ethylene ( ET ), and hypersensitive response ( HR )e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“CAS02 and COS synergistically activated salicylic acid ( SA ), ethylene ( ET ), and hypersensitive response ( HR ) defense signaling pathways in tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of CAS02 and COS reduced the relative abundance of P. nicotianae in the rhizosphere soil.

Treatment
combined application of CAS02 and COSe6
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee6pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of P. nicotianaee6
Direction
reducede6
Setting
rhizosphere soile6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e6

“The combined application of CAS02 and COS reduced the relative abundance of P. nicotianae in the rhizosphere soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of CAS02 and COS increased the relative abundance of bacterial taxa potentially involved in disease suppression.

Outcome
relative abundance of bacterial taxae7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
potentially involved in disease suppressione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco black shank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
e7

“increased the relative abundance of bacterial taxa potentially involved in disease suppression, such as Nocardioides , Devosia and Bradyrhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1376 · show in text ↑

chitooligosaccharide · Phytophthora nicotianae · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.