Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Diverse plant promoting bacterial species differentially improve tomato plant fitness under water stress

Elisa Zampieri; Elisabetta Franchi; Luca Giovannini; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Food crops are increasingly susceptible to the challenging impacts of climate change, encompassing both abiotic and biotic stresses, that cause yield losses. Root-associated microorganisms, including plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), can improve plant growth as well as plant tolerance to environmental stresses. The aims of this work were to characterize bacteria isolated from soil and roots of tomato plants grown in open field. Methods: Biochemical and molecular analyses were used to evaluate the PGP potential of the considered strains on tomato plants in controlled conditions, also assessing their effects under a water deficit condition. The isolated strains were classified by 16S gene sequencing and exhibited typical features of PGPB, such as the release of siderophores, the production of proteases, and phosphorous solubilization. Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strains led to the identification of potentially interesting strains that increased shoot height and dry weight. Three strains were then selected for the experiment under water deficit in controlled conditions. The tomato plants were monitored from biometric and physiological point of view, and the effect of inoculation at molecular level was verified with a targeted RT-qPCR based approach on genes that play a role under water deficit condition. Results: Results revealed the PGP potential of different bacterial isolates in tomato plants, both in well-watered and stressed conditions. The used integrated approach allowed to obtain a broader picture of the plant status, from biometric, eco-physiological and molecular point of view. Gene expression analysis showed a different regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteins, depending on the treatments. Discussion: Overall, results showed significant changes in tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation, also under water deficit, that hold promise for future field applications of these bacterial strains, suggesting that a synergistic and complementary interaction between diverse PGPB is an important point to be considered for their exploitation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected bacterial strains increased tomato shoot height.

Treatment
Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strainse0
Interactor
selected strainse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strains led to the identification of potentially interesting strains that increased shoot height and dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected bacterial strains increased tomato dry weight.

Treatment
Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strainse0
Interactor
selected strainse0symbiont
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating tomato plants with eleven selected strains led to the identification of potentially interesting strains that increased shoot height and dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation changed regulation of genes in abscisic acid pathways depending on treatment.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione1
Compound
abscisic acide0
Outcome
regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acide0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis showed a different regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteins, depending on the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation changed regulation of genes in osmoprotectant compound pathways depending on treatment.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione1
Outcome
regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteinse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis showed a different regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteins, depending on the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation changed regulation of genes in heat shock protein pathways depending on treatment.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione1
Outcome
heat shock proteinse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis showed a different regulation of genes involved in pathways related to abscisic acid, osmoprotectant compounds and heat shock proteins, depending on the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation caused significant changes in tomato even under water deficit.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
changes in tomato plantse0
Qualifier
under water deficite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“results showed significant changes in tomato plants due to the bacterial inoculation, also under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1972 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.