Paper · 2023 · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Silica-Based Nanodelivery Systems Loaded with Matrine for the Brown Planthopper Green Control and Rice Growth Promotion

Chunjie Zhao; Mengna Tao; Lanqing Xu; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
34
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Botanical pesticides have been shown to be an appropriate technology for crop protection as they present a high level of safety to ecosystems and biodiversity. However, most botanical pesticides have defects of slow action, short persistence, and instability during pest control, which restrict their further development and application. Currently, nanodelivery systems have displayed great promise to solve these deficiencies. Herein, we used mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) as nanocarriers loaded with botanical pesticide matrine and coated with chitosan to prepare matrine nanoparticles (MaNPs) for controlling Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) on rice ( Oryza sativa L.). The results showed that MaNPs possessed excellent stability and high biosafety to nontarget organism tadpoles. Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPs decreased the populations of adult and nymph N. lugens and particularly resulted in a 55.1% decrease in nymph N. lugens population and a 74.8% increase in rice shoot biomass, as compared to infected control. Moreover, MaNPs exhibited superior control performance for N. lugens reproduction than conventional matrine pesticides, which was due to the induced higher levels of chemical defense-related compounds in rice plants. Altogether, chitosan-functionalized silica nanodelivery systems could be an effective and eco-friendly nanocarrier for loading botanical pesticides to prepare nanopesticides in sustainable chemistry and promote their green applications in pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matrine nanoparticles had good stability and high biosafety for tadpoles.

Outcome
stability and high biosafetye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“MaNPs possessed excellent stability and high biosafety to nontarget organism tadpoles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 25 mg/L matrine nanoparticles reduced adult planthopper populations on rice.

Treatment
Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPse0
Interactor
N. lugensNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
populations of adulte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPs decreased the populations of adult and nymph N. lugens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Growth Promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 25 mg/L matrine nanoparticles reduced nymph planthopper population by 55.1% relative to infected controls.

Treatment
Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPse0
Interactor
N. lugensNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
nymph N. lugens populatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
55.1%e0
Comparator
infected controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPs decreased the populations of adult and nymph N. lugens and particularly resulted in a 55.1% decrease in nymph N. lugens population and a 74.8% increase in rice shoot biomass, as compared to infected control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 25 mg/L matrine nanoparticles increased rice shoot biomass by 74.8% relative to infected controls.

Treatment
Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPse0
Interactor
N. lugensNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
rice shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
74.8%e0
Comparator
infected controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-sprayed 25 mg/L MaNPs decreased the populations of adult and nymph N. lugens and particularly resulted in a 55.1% decrease in nymph N. lugens population and a 74.8% increase in rice shoot biomass, as compared to infected control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matrine nanoparticles controlled planthopper reproduction better than conventional matrine pesticides.

Treatment
MaNPse0
Interactor
N. lugensNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
N. lugens reproductione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
conventional matrine pesticidese0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MaNPs exhibited superior control performance for N. lugens reproduction than conventional matrine pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1141 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher chemical defense compound levels in rice were attributed as the reason for superior planthopper control by matrine nanoparticles.

Treatment
inducede0
Outcome
chemical defense-related compoundse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was due to the induced higher levels of chemical defense-related compounds in rice plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1239 · show in text ↑

Matrine · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.