Paper · 2023 · Archives of Agriculture Research and Technology (AART)

Experimental Statistical for Genetic Breeding Study of Wheat Crop

Luiz Gustavo Batista Ferreira

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The key purpose of this study was used experimental statistics methods to evaluate, characterize and conserve the genetic resources of the Active Wheat Germplasm Bank (AWGB) and promote pre-breeding the Rural Development of Paraná State (IDR Paraná), Brazil. For that purpose, 209 accessions from the IDR Paraná Active Germplasm Bank and 16 cultivars in a simple lattice design (15x15) were sown in the experimental area of IDR Paraná, in Londrina, Paraná State, and data from 16 morphological and agronomic characteristics were taken. The statistics methods used were the analysis of variance (ANOVA), grouping of averages, analysis of simple linear correlation and analysis of genetic diversity with subsequent grouping by the UPGMA and Tocher methods were performed. It was verified the average efficiency of the lattice was 1.21 % with IC5 %: [99.31 ~ 103.11 %], representing little efficiency in relation to the randomized block design. Fourteen variables showed significance by the F test, indicating that at least one genotype differs from the others for each variable. By the analysis of genetic diversity, 3 groups were obtained in which the genotypes T092125 (Group C) and IA 072118 with T062113 (Group B) were in two isolated groups and the third group gathering the remaining 223 genotypes. This fact does not directly represent a narrow genetic basis for Active Germplasm Bank of IDR Paraná, due than 99 % of the variation is actually contained in agronomic variables: days to maturation (MAT) and ear (ESP), plant height (AP) and ear size (TE). Taking as a basis the grouping of means by Scott-Knott for these variables and grain weight per ear (PG / ESP), the formation of 4 for AP and ESP, 3 TE and PG / ESP groups, 2 for DC and P100G, reflecting wide diversity within each variable and in the set of these variables. The correlation analyzes showed a positive value between TE with PG / ESP and DC and a negative value between ESP and PG / ESP, both significant. Thus, the direction of crossings, to increase productivity, between genotypes of this set, must be in the direction of obtaining plants with earlier earing and with larger ears size. It can be inferred that the set of accessions evaluated has a broad genetic basis for agronomic variables. The 225 characterized accessions represent 49 % of the total accessions of wheat in the Active Wheat Germplasm Bank (AWGB) that have been regenerated and multiplied, being able to be directed to crossings focusing on pre-improvement and / or improvement to obtain new cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lattice design had average efficiency of 1.21% and little advantage over randomized blocks.

Outcome
average efficiency of the latticee0
Value
1.21 %e0
Comparator
randomized block designe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average efficiency of the lattice was 1.21 % with IC5 %: [99.31 ~ 103.11 %], representing little efficiency in relation to the randomized block design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen wheat variables differed significantly among genotypes by the F test.

Outcome
variables showed significance by the F teste0
Value
Fourteene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen variables showed significance by the F test, indicating that at least one genotype differs from the others for each variable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic diversity analysis separated wheat genotypes into three groups, including two isolated groups.

Material
T092125e0
Outcome
groupse0
Value
3 groupse0
Qualifier
two isolated groupse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 groups were obtained in which the genotypes T092125 (Group C) and IA 072118 with T062113 (Group B) were in two isolated groups and the third group gathering the remaining 223 genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic variables accounted for 99% of variation in the wheat germplasm set.

Outcome
variatione0
Value
99 %e0
Qualifier
agronomic variables: days to maturation (MAT) and ear (ESP), plant height (AP) and ear size (TE)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“99 % of the variation is actually contained in agronomic variables: days to maturation (MAT) and ear (ESP), plant height (AP) and ear size (TE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott-Knott grouping yielded four groups for AP and ESP.

Outcome
AP and ESPe0
Value
4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formation of 4 for AP and ESP, 3 TE and PG / ESP groups, 2 for DC and P100G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott-Knott grouping yielded three groups for TE and PG / ESP.

Outcome
TE and PG / ESPe0
Value
3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formation of 4 for AP and ESP, 3 TE and PG / ESP groups, 2 for DC and P100G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott-Knott grouping yielded two groups for DC and P100G.

Outcome
DC and P100Ge0
Value
2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formation of 4 for AP and ESP, 3 TE and PG / ESP groups, 2 for DC and P100G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear size correlated positively and significantly with grain weight per ear and DC.

Organ / stage
TEe0
Outcome
PG / ESP and DCe0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation analyzes showed a positive value between TE with PG / ESP and DC and a negative value between ESP and PG / ESP, both significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ESP correlated negatively and significantly with grain weight per ear.

Organ / stage
ESPe0
Outcome
PG / ESPe0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation analyzes showed a positive value between TE with PG / ESP and DC and a negative value between ESP and PG / ESP, both significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend crosses toward earlier earing and larger ears to increase productivity.

Outcome
plants with earlier earing and with larger ears sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the direction of crossings, to increase productivity, between genotypes of this set, must be in the direction of obtaining plants with earlier earing and with larger ears size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated wheat accessions were inferred to have a broad genetic basis for agronomic variables.

Outcome
broad genetic basis for agronomic variablese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the set of accessions evaluated has a broad genetic basis for agronomic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 225 characterized accessions represented 49% of wheat germplasm bank accessions.

Outcome
characterized accessionse0
Value
49 %e0
Qualifier
225 characterized accessionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 225 characterized accessions represent 49 % of the total accessions of wheat in the Active Wheat Germplasm Bank (AWGB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2270–2392 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the characterized accessions for crossing to develop new cultivars.

Outcome
crossings focusing on pre-improvement and / or improvement to obtain new cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being able to be directed to crossings focusing on pre-improvement and / or improvement to obtain new cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2436–2548 · show in text ↑
e1

“accessions of wheat in the Active Wheat Germplasm Bank (AWGB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2392 · show in text ↑