Paper · 2023 · Applied Sciences

Effects of Varying Planting Patterns on Wheat Aphids’ Occurrence and the Control Effect of Pesticide Reduction Spraying Process by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Haifeng Gao; Yuyang Shen; Li Chen; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A walnut–wheat intercropping pattern is practiced widely in southern Xinjiang to alleviate the contradiction between the lack of cultivated land resources and to increase economic value. Previous studies have confirmed that an alley cropping pattern could change the microclimate by supplying additional ecological functions such as windbreak, light interception, water conservation, etc. Cereal aphids (including Sitobion avenae, Rhopalosiphum padi, Metopolophium dirhodum, etc.) are commonly spread pests that harm wheat plants. But, the difference in population numbers between local patterns is still unknown. Pesticide reduction is the national strategy in China to alleviate the contraction between the demand of grain yield and environment protection. Plant protection-unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) spraying pesticides are the most efficient method to control pests. However, compared to traditional artificial spraying method, how the UAV spraying method affect the control effect of reduced concentration pesticide is unclear. In order to address this problem, we conducted field investigations at Zepu county in southern Xinjiang to test the difference between walnut–wheat intercropping and wheat monocropping patterns for three consecutive years. And, we employed the field experiments to ensure the effectiveness of the reduced concentration common pesticides through the UAV spraying method. In conclusion, we conducted a comparison of the control effects of two spraying methods under conditions of reduced pesticide usage. Our findings revealed that the population of cereal aphids was larger in the intercropping pattern compared to the monocropping pattern. Although the control effect of the reduced treatment was lower than the regular dosage, some treatments still demonstrated sufficient capability to eliminate aphids, particularly when considering the effect within major varieties. Additionally, the use of the UAV spraying method exhibited a satisfactory effect when compared to the traditional artificial spraying method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal aphid populations were larger in walnut–wheat intercropping than wheat monocropping.

Treatment
intercropping patterne0
Interactor
cereal aphidse0pest
Outcome
population of cereal aphidse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
monocropping patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“the population of cereal aphids was larger in the intercropping pattern compared to the monocropping pattern.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced pesticide dosage controlled aphids less effectively than regular dosage.

Treatment
reduced treatmente0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
regular dosagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“the control effect of the reduced treatment was lower than the regular dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some reduced pesticide treatments still eliminated aphids sufficiently.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
sufficient capability to eliminate aphidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“some treatments still demonstrated sufficient capability to eliminate aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1841 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV spraying had a satisfactory aphid control effect compared with artificial spraying.

Outcome
satisfactory effecte0
Comparator
traditional artificial spraying methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of the UAV spraying method exhibited a satisfactory effect when compared to the traditional artificial spraying method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2049 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.